Case No.: IT-95-14-A

BEFORE THE PRE-APPEAL JUDGE

Before:
Judge Fausto Pocar, Pre-Appeal Judge

Registrar:
Mr. Hans Holthuis

Order of:
8 December 2003

PROSECUTOR

v.

TIHOMIR BLASKIC

________________________

ORDER

________________________

Counsel for the Prosecutor:

Mr. Norman Farrell

Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr. Anto Nobilo
Mr. Russell Hayman
Mr. Andrew Paley

 

I, FAUSTO POCAR, Pre-Appeal Judge in this case;

NOTING the "Prosecutionís Request for Re-Consideration of Present Scheduling Order for Evidentiary Hearing and Request for Related Orders" ("Prosecutionís Request for Reconsideration") filed on 4 December 2003 and the "Appellantís Response to Prosecutionís Request for Re-Consideration of Present Scheduling Order for Evidentiary Hearing and Request for Related Orders" filed on 5 December 2003 ("Appellantís Response");

CONSIDERING that, given certain contents of the Prosecutionís Request for Reconsideration and the Appellantís Response, these two documents should have been filed confidentially;

HEREBY ORDER as follows:

    1. Henceforth, both the Prosecutionís Request for Reconsideration and the Appellantís Response shall be treated as confidential filings by any individual, group, or entity that has received it.

    2. Any individual, group, or entity that has knowledge of the Prosecutionís Request for Reconsideration and the Appellantís Response and their contents shall not make any use of them and shall not disclose their contents to any other individual, group, or entity.

    3. Any violation of this order may constitute contempt of the International Tribunal, which is regulated by Rule 77 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Tribunal.

 

Done in both English and French, the English text being authoritative.

Done this 8th day of December 2003,
At The Hague,
The Netherlands.

_____________
Fausto Pocar
Pre-Appeal Judge

[Seal of the Tribunal]