Case No. IT-01-47-T

IN TRIAL CHAMBER II

Before:
Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti
Judge Vonimbolana Rasoazanany
Judge Bert Swart

Registrar:
Mr Hans Holthuis

Decision of:
29 June 2005

THE PROSECUTOR

v.

ENVER HADZIHASANOVIC
AMIR KUBURA

_________________________________________

ORDER AMENDING THE SCHEDULING ORDER FURTHER TO THE MOTION BY DEFENCE FOR ENVER HADZIHASANOVIC TO OBTAIN AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS FINAL TRIAL BRIEF

_________________________________________

The Office of the Prosecutor:

Mr Daryl Mundis
Ms Tecla Henry-Benjamin
Mr Stefan Waespi
Mr Matthias Neuner

Defence Counsel:

Ms Edina Residovic and Mr Stéphane Bourgon for Enver Hadzihasanovic
Mr Fahrudin Ibrisimovic and Mr Rodney Dixon for Amir Kubura

 

TRIAL CHAMBER II ("Chamber") of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 ("Tribunal"),

NOTING the Motion by Defence for Enver Hadzihasanovic (“Defence for Enver Hadzihasanovic”) to Obtain an Extension of Time to File his Final Trial Brief ("Motion") filed on 27 June 2005, in which the Defence for Mr Hadzihasanovic requested an additional seven days to file its final trial brief further to the Chamber’s Order on Admission of Chamber Exhibits rendered on 22 June 2005, in which the Chamber ordered that all the war journals and operational logbooks ("War Diaries") be admitted into evidence, pursuant to Rule 89(C) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence ("Rules") of the Tribunal;

NOTING the oral responses of the Prosecution and the Defence for Mr Kubura to the Motion on 28 June 2005;

NOTING the Scheduling Order of 22 June 2005 in which the Chamber ruled that the parties’ final trial briefs should be filed by 4 July 2005;

CONSIDERING that the Defence for Mr Hadzihasanovic stated that, pursuant to Articles 20 and 21 of the Statute of the Tribunal ("Statute"), the accused should have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence and should be able to present an effective defence in full equality;

CONSIDERING that, according to the Defence for Mr Hadzihasanovic, the accused Hadzihasanovic should have adequate time (i) to reconcile the arguments presented in his final brief in the light of the new evidence from the War Diaries, and (ii) to determine whether the fact that such new evidence was not taken into account during the Defence case has seriously prejudiced the Accused, thus warranting additional measures;

CONSIDERING that, pursuant to Rules 66 and 68 of the Rules, the Prosecution is obliged to disclose the documents in its possession or under its control which are necessary for the preparation of an accused’s defence, which will be used by the Prosecution as evidence at trial, or which constitute exculpatory evidence;

CONSIDERING that it has been established that all the documents from the War Diaries were disclosed to the Defence for Mr Hadzihasanovic during the pre-trial stage of this case and that the Defence for Mr Hadzihasanovic therefore had adequate time during both the Prosecution and Defence cases to develop its strategy in light of the documents taken from the War Diaries;

CONSIDERING, however, that Rule 127 of the Rules provides that a Trial Chamber may enlarge or reduce any time prescribed by these Rules on good cause being shown by motion;

CONSIDERING that, conscious of the additional workload generated by the filing of the entire War Diaries with regard to the drafting of the final brief, the Chamber considers that there is good cause for extending the time for the filing of the final trial briefs and the Prosecutor’s closing arguments until Tuesday 12 July 2005, with the option of extending the hearing, if necessary, on the last day of the Defence closing arguments;

FOR THE FOREOING REASONS,

PURSUANT to Rule 127 of the Rules;

PARTIALLY GRANTS the Motion and

ORDERS that:

STATES that, pursuant to Rule 87 of the Rules, the proceedings shall be declared closed after the Defence for Mr Kubura has presented its closing arguments.

 

Done in French and in English, the French version being authoritative.

__________
Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti
Presiding

Done this twenty-ninth day of June 2005
At The Hague
The Netherlands

[Seal of the Tribunal]