Case No.: IT-98-34-T
BEFORE TRIAL CHAMBER I SECTION A
Before:
Judge Liu Daqun, Presiding
Judge Maureen Harding Clark
Judge Fatoumata Diarra
Registrar:
Mr. Hans Holthuis
Decision of:
4 October 2002
PROSECUTOR
v.
MLADEN NALETILIC aka "TUTA"
and
VINKO MARTINOVIC aka "STELA"
___________________________________________________________
DECISION ON THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE DEFENCE CONCERNING EXHIBITS TENDERED THROUG WITNESSES MC, ME AND MH
___________________________________________________________
The Office of the Prosecutor:
Mr. Kenneth Scott
Counsel for the Accused:
Mr. Kresimir Krsnik, for Mladen Naletilic
Mr. Branko Seric, for Vinko Martinovic
TRIAL CHAMBER I, SECTION A ("the Chamber") of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 ("the Tribunal"),
BEING SEISED OF the following submissions:
NOTING the oral arguments of the parties during the hearings on 19, 22 and 23 July 2002;
CONSIDERING that in principle, exhibits should be submitted through a witness;
CONSIDERING that, pursuant to Rule 89 (C) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence ("the Rules"), "[a] Chamber may admit any relevant evidence which it deems to have probative value";
CONSIDERING that the Appeals Chamber has held that "[t]here is no legal basis … that proof of authenticity is a separate threshold requirement for the admissibility of documentary evidence";1
CONSIDERING, however, that in accordance with the jurisprudence of the Tribunal, it is required that the evidence presents "sufficient indicia of reliability";2
CONSIDERING that the party conducting the direct examination of a witness must lay the source of the document it wishes to submit through the witness, in order for that document to meet the required degree of reliability;
CONSIDERING that the party conducting the cross-examination of a witness must lay the background and the source of the documents it wishes to submit through the witness, in order to allow the witness to recognise or reject the document;
CONSIDERING furthermore that the mere admission of a document does not necessarily mean that the document gives an accurate portrayal of the facts;3
RECALLING that the decision to authorise the admission of a document is without prejudice to the value or weight which will be accorded to the document at the final stage of the trial;
NOTING that the Prosecution was asked to provide further information as to the source of exhibit P401.14, but has not filed any submission on this matter;
FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS,
PURSUANT to Rules 54 and 89 of the Rules,
HEREBY ORDERS that the following exhibits are admitted into evidence:
P609.3; P612.3; P664.1;
DENIES the admission of exhibit:
P401.1;
REMINDS the parties that, unless otherwise ordered, any objection to the list of exhibits submitted by the other party must be filed within seven (7) days of the date of the filing of the said list.
Done in both English and French, the English version being authoritative.
Dated this fourth day of October 2002,
At The Hague,
The Netherlands.
______________
Judge Liu Daqun
Presiding Judge
[Seal of the Tribunal]