Case No. IT-03-68-T

IN TRIAL CHAMBER II

Before:
Judge Carmel Agius, Presiding
Judge Hans Henrik Brydensholt
Judge Albin Eser

Registrar:
Mr. Hans Holthuis

Decision of:
21 March 2006

PROSECUTOR

v.

NASER ORIC

_______________________________________

DECISION ON PROSECUTION MOTION SEEKING LEAVE TO FILE A CORRIGENDUM TO PROSECUTION FINAL BRIEF

_______________________________________

The Office of the Prosecutor:

Ms. Patricia Sellers Viseur
Mr. Gramsci di Fazio
Ms. JoAnne Richardson
Mr. José Doria

Counsel for the Accused:

Ms. Vasvija Vidovic
Mr. John Jones

 

TRIAL CHAMBER II ("Trial Chamber") of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 ("Tribunal"):

BEING SEIZED of the "Urgent Motion Regarding Prosecutionís Breach of Scheduling Order for Case Completion" ("Defence Motion"), filed by counsel for Naser Oric ("Defence") on 20 March 2006;

NOTING the "Prosecution Response to Urgent Motion Regarding Prosecutionís Breach of Scheduling Order for Case Completion" ("Prosecution Response"), filed by the Office of the Prosecutor ("Prosecution") on 20 March 2006;

ALSO BEING SEIZED of the "Prosecution Motion to Request Leave to File a Corrigendum to the Prosecutionís Final Brief" ("Prosecution Motion"), filed on 20 March 2006, with confidential Annex A1 and Annex B2;

NOTING this Trial Chamberís Scheduling Order for Case Completion of 9 February 2006 ("Scheduling Order"), in which both the Prosecution and the Defence were ordered to file their final briefs no later than 17 March 2006, and responses to each otherís closing briefs no later than
24 March 2006;

NOTING that a document purporting to be the Prosecutionís final brief, with the acknowledgement of numerous errors, faulty formatting and absence of indexes, and using the word Ďdraftí on top of each page without intending the document to be filed as a Ďdraftí,3 was filed on Friday, 17 March 2006 ("17 March filing");

FINDING that it is in the interest of justice to accept the corrigendum attached as Annex B to the Prosecution Motion and filed on Monday, 20 March 2006 ("20 March filing"), as the Prosecution Final Brief;

ACKNOWLEDGING that the Prosecutionís handling of this matter causes inconvenience to the Defence, which needs to be addressed;

FINDING that the Prosecution shall, in order to minimise this inconvenience, provide the Defence and the Trial Chamber with a synopsis detailing which paragraphs of the 20 March filing correspond to those in the 17 March filing, by no later than Friday, 24 March 2006;

CONSIDERING that the Prosecution has not recorded the changes made to the 17 March filing, and that the non-exhaustive list of changes provided as Annex A to the Prosecution Motion is insufficient to apprise the Defence of all changes made, the Trial Chamber finds it appropriate that the Prosecution seek a technical solution which would allow retroactively tracking all changes that have been made, and report back to the Trial Chamber on the feasibility of such a task by no later than Friday, 24 March 2006;

FINDING that, to further minimise inconvenience as the Defence has already started to prepare its response to the Prosecutionís Final Brief on the basis of the 17 March filing, the Defence will be allowed to refer to the 17 March filing in its response to the Prosecution Final Brief, as well as during closing arguments, if they so prefer;

CONSIDERING that the Prosecutionís 20 March filing necessarily entails an extension of time for the Defence to be able to file its response to the Prosecutionís Final Brief, to which the Prosecution has already agreed;

CONSIDERING FURTHER that, in view of the extension of time referred to in the previous paragraph, the Scheduling Order regarding presentation of closing arguments shall be modified granting one additional day to the Defence following the Prosecution closing argument, in which it may further prepare its argument, if the Defence request so;

PURSUANT TO Rules 54, 86, 126bis and 127 of the Tribunalís Rules of Procedure and Evidence

HEREBY DISPOSES of the Prosecution Motion, the Defence Motion and the Prosecution Response as follows:

1. The Prosecution shall file a synopsis detailing which paragraphs of the 20 March filing correspond to those in the 17 March filing by Friday, 24 March 2006. The Prosecution is also ordered to seek a technical solution to retroactively track all changes that have been made to the 20 March filing, and report back to the Trial Chamber by Friday, 24 March 2006.

2. The time-limit for the Defence to file any response to the Prosecutionís final brief is extended to Monday, 27 March 2006.

3. The time-limit for the Prosecution to file any response to the Defenceís final brief remains unchanged, i.e., Friday, 24 March 2006.

4. The Scheduling Order regarding presentation of closing arguments shall be modified granting one additional day to the Defence following the Prosecution closing argument, if the Defence request so.

 

Done in French and English, the English version being authoritative.

Dated this twenty-first day of March 2006
At The Hague
The Netherlands

______________________
Carmel Agius
Presiding Judge

[Seal of the Tribunal]


1. Annex A contains a non-exhaustive list of the corrections the Prosecution has made to its final brief filed on 17 March 2006.
2. Annex B contains a corrected version of the Prosecutionís final brief filed on 17 March 2006.
3. Prosecution Response, para. 5.