Tribunal Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Page 26458

 1                          Tuesday, 22 January 2008

 2                          [Open session]

 3                          [The accused entered court]

 4                          [The accused Pusic not present in Court]

 5                          --- Upon commencing at 9.00 a.m.

 6            JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] Registrar, kindly call the case,

 7    please.

 8            THE REGISTRAR:  Good morning, Your Honours.  Good morning everyone

 9    in and around the courtroom.  This is case number IT-04-74-T, the

10    Prosecution versus Prlic et al.  Thank you, Your Honours.

11            JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] Thank you, registrar.

12            Today we are Tuesday, the 22nd of January, 2008.  I'd like to

13    greet Mr. Scott, Defence counsel and the accused.  I can see that

14    Mr. Scott has got a lectern in front of him which means we're going to be

15    hearing a witness but prior to that I have two oral decisions to read out

16    then I will move into private session to address another issue.

17            First oral decision relating to the reply which the Prosecution

18    must make.  On the 18th of January 2008 Stojic [as interpreted] Defence

19    team asked to have an extension of time in order to be able to present

20    it's own case.  The Defence in its submission has asked more or less to

21    have three months between the end of the Prosecution case and the

22    presentation of its own case and the testimony of its first witness.

23            As the Trial Chamber will hand out a decision, the Trial Chamber

24    is asking the Prosecution, i.e., Mr. Scott, to tell us what his

25    observations for tomorrow are relating to this particular issue.  Unless

Page 26459

 1    Mr. Scott is able to respond to this straight away.

 2            MR. SCOTT:  Good morning, Your Honours, Mr. President, all of Your

 3    Honours.  Good morning to each of you, and good morning to all those in

 4    and around the courtroom.  I am able to briefly respond, Your Honours, if

 5    it will assist the Chamber to go ahead and take that now.

 6            We also did file a very short two-page response yesterday and it

 7    may not have reached -- it may not have reached the Chamber yet, but in a

 8    nutshell, Your Honour, the Prosecution on review of the motion that's been

 9    filed has basically two positions, one on the question of the date of

10    starting the Defence cases and one on the question of the filing of the

11    Defence papers.

12            In connection with the time I'll take that first.  The Prosecution

13    is agreeable to -- not to an extension to the middle of June but an

14    extension until the middle of April, until approximately the 14th of

15    April, which would be an additional one-month period.  Prosecution has no

16    problem with -- with agreeing to that, understands that everyone,

17    including the Prosecution, the Chamber, and the Defence has been quite

18    busy over the past weeks and it may be in everyone's best interest, and in

19    particular the Defence, to have some additional time to prepare.  So I

20    suppose we have a middle ground position.  We're not agreeable to the

21    extension to the 16th of -- 17th of June, but we would be agreeable to an

22    extension to approximately the 14th of April or sometime in the second

23    half of April.

24            In terms of the document filings, however, Your Honour, the

25    Prosecution asks that those remain the same, that in terms of receiving

Page 26460

 1    the witness list, the Defence filings under Rule 65 ter that we would have

 2    those, Your Honour.

 3            The Chamber will recall that -- my apologies for speaking so

 4    quickly this morning.

 5            The Chamber will recall that for the Prosecution case our

 6    disclosures, of course, were months and even years ahead of the beginning

 7    of the case.  Our Rule 65 ter list was filed at least four months or five

 8    months before the trial started after a period of at least two years of

 9    disclosure and discovery.  So in a nutshell, Your Honour, we believe and

10    submit and ask that the Chamber's scheduling concerning the filing of the

11    Defence papers, that is their exhibit list, the witness list, et cetera,

12    be done according to the current schedule, that is by the 3rd of March,

13    but as to the beginning of the case itself, that we would be agreeable to

14    an extension until mid-April.  Thank you.

15            JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] Very well.  Now, two sum up your

16    position, to sum up your position, but prior to that there's a mistake in

17    the transcript on line 17 page 1.  It's not Stojic Defence but Defence

18    teams overall.

19            So to sum up your position, I think Ms. Nozica wanted to take the

20    floor on this matter, but I'll give you the floor later.

21            Now, to sum up, two important -- two -- two issues you address.

22    You would like to maintain the schedule as is concerning the filing of the

23    lists.  However, as far as the beginning of the Defence case is concerned,

24    in other words, the testimony of the first witness, you are against the

25    17th of June because that would be three months.  However, you -- you

Page 26461

 1    would accept this if it were set towards the end of April.

 2            I think I have summed up what you have said.

 3            Ms. Nozica, let me give you the floor.  What would you like to

 4    say?

 5            MS. NOZICA: [Interpretation] Good morning.  Thank you, Your

 6    Honours.  I fully support this proposal of the Defence, but you have just

 7    corrected yourself.  This was not the proposal only of Stojic Defence but

 8    of all Defence teams.

 9            JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] So second decision, oral

10    decision, relating to the application for admission of the exhibit number

11    2D 00591.

12            On the 18th of January, 2008, Stojic Defence team seized the

13    Chamber for an application -- of an application for admission of the

14    Exhibit number 2D 00591.  This exhibit had been presented through the

15    witness Ciril Ribicic who testified on the 10th and 11th of December,

16    2007.

17            The Stojic Defence team had applied for the admission of this

18    exhibit on the 12th of December, 2007, through its list IC 00753.  On the

19    15th of January, 2008, the Trial Chamber dismissed this, the application

20    of this exhibit, on the ground that the translation in English was not

21    input in the e-court system.  The Trial Chamber would like to recall the

22    parties, however, that it has the power to reconsider its own decisions if

23    particular circumstances come to light.  This may relate to new facts or

24    new submissions which would substantiate such a reconsideration in order

25    to avoid any injustice.

Page 26462

 1            The Trial Chamber notes that the Exhibit 2D 00591 is now being

 2    fully input in the e-court system and that the Defence of Stojic has

 3    disclosed the English translation in a very short space of time following

 4    the decision of the Trial Chamber of the 15th of January, 2008.  The Trial

 5    Chamber acknowledges that this exhibit was also presented to the witness

 6    Ciril Ribicic in that it shows sufficient indications of relevance,

 7    probative value, and reliability.  Consequently, the Trial Chamber decides

 8    to admit as an exception 2D 00591.

 9            I will now like to move into private session for a very short

10    time, registrar, please.

11                          [Private session]

12  (redacted)

13  (redacted)

14  (redacted)

15  (redacted)

16  (redacted)

17  (redacted)

18  (redacted)

19  (redacted)

20  (redacted)

21  (redacted)

22  (redacted)

23  (redacted)

24  (redacted)

25  (redacted)

Page 26463

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11    Page 26463 redacted. Private session

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

Page 26464

 1  (redacted)

 2  (redacted)

 3  (redacted)

 4  (redacted)

 5  (redacted)

 6  (redacted)

 7  (redacted)

 8  (redacted)

 9  (redacted)

10                          [Open session]

11            THE REGISTRAR:  Your Honours, we're back in open session.

12            JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] Very well.  In open session I

13    would like to give the floor to the registrar because he has a number of

14    IC numbers to give us.

15            THE REGISTRAR:  Thank you, Your Honours.  The OTP has submitted

16    its response to documents entered by 2D, 3D, and 4D through Witness

17    Thornberry.  These responses submitted by the OTP shall be given Exhibit

18    number IC 785, 786, and 787 respectively.  Thank you, Your Honours.

19            JUDGE ANTONETTI: [Interpretation] Very well.  Thank you,

20    registrar.  We shall now move into closed session.

21                          [Closed session]

22  (redacted)

23  (redacted)

24  (redacted)

25  (redacted)

Page 26465

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11    Pages 26465-26574 redacted. Closed session

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

Page 26575

 1    (redacted)

 2    (redacted)

 3    (redacted)

 4                          --- Whereupon the hearing adjourned at 1.45 p.m.,

 5                          to be reconvened on Wednesday, the 23rd day of

 6                          January, 2008, at 9.00 a.m.

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25