Tribunal Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Page 93

 1                          Monday, 10 September 2001

 2                          [Open session]

 3                          [The accused entered court]

 4                          --- Upon commencing at 9.30 a.m.

 5            JUDGE HUNT:  Call the case, please.

 6            THE REGISTRAR:  Good morning, Your Honours.  Case number

 7    IT-98-32-T, the Prosecutor versus Mitar Vasiljevic.

 8            JUDGE HUNT:  Appearances for the Prosecution.

 9            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, for the Prosecution, Dermot Groome,

10    Sabine Baur, and Frederic Ossogo.

11            JUDGE HUNT:  Thank you.  And for the Defence?

12            MR. DOMAZET:  Your Honour, Vladimir Domazet, lead counsel for the

13    accused Mitar Vasiljevic, and Mr. Radomir Tanaskovic, co-counsel in this

14    case.

15            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Vasiljevic, can you hear the proceedings in a

16    language which you understand?  There's no need to stand up.

17            THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] Yes, I can, Your Honour.

18            JUDGE HUNT:  Thank you very much.  Sit down, please, sir.

19            I won't ask you that again whilst we're in this court, but if you

20    do have any problems at any time hearing the proceedings, make sure you

21    make that known so we can have it fixed for you.  It is absolutely vital

22    that you hear everything that goes on.

23            Now, Mr. Groome, before we take your opening statement, there are

24    a couple of points that I think I should raise with you.  So far as I can

25    see, the accused has never pleaded to the amended indictment.  If you know


Page 94

 1    to the contrary, you've got to let me know now, but it certainly doesn't

 2    appear in any transcript.

 3            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, that amended indictment was filed at the

 4    last court appearance, and he did not plead at that time.

 5            JUDGE HUNT:  Well then, we better make sure that he pleads before

 6    you start.

 7            The second matter, in relation to sitting hours.  As I understand

 8    it at this stage, and it may alter, we will not be sharing this court with

 9    any other trial.  So we will be sitting the usual sitting hours, 9.30 to

10    11.00, 11.30 to 1.00, 2.30 until 4.00.  This week we'll be sitting Monday

11    to Thursday only because of a build-up of pre-trial matters in some other

12    cases that I have to deal with on Friday.

13            Depending upon the speed with which this trial moves, I hope that

14    we may be able to get through it sitting four days or perhaps four and a

15    half days a week.  We'll see how we go.

16            I was rather alarmed to read in the latest pre-trial brief that

17    the estimate for the Prosecution case has grown from 15 days to 26 and a

18    half days, but perhaps the discussions we had at the Pre-Trial Conference

19    will have cured some of that problem.  It simply cannot be 26 days.

20    That's two months' worth of work, and we don't have that sort of time,

21    and, in any event, we don't want a great deal of repetition.  No doubt by

22    the time we have finished the evidence of the witnesses this week, we will

23    have a very good idea of where the issues really do lie in relation to

24    what might be called the chapeau issues.

25            Another matter is this:  I was informed on Friday that the


Page 95

 1    accused's family is using the cubicle at the end of the courtroom there to

 2    watch the proceedings this week.  I hope that we'll be able to accommodate

 3    them there for the whole week, but I do point out a problem, that it is

 4    possible from that cubicle to see the witnesses, or at least side on, and

 5    all but one of the witnesses this week has an order for protective

 6    measures in his favour.

 7            There have been some screens erected in the cubicle, and there

 8    will have to be some checking to see how suitable they are.  But I do draw

 9    to your attention, Mr. Groome, that there are members of the public - in

10    effect members of the public - in there this week.  So you might also keep

11    an eye on what can be done to ensure that the witness is not visible by

12    the naked eye from that room.

13            Finally, Mr. Domazet has filed now his argument in support of the

14    admissibility of the evidence which tends to establish that there were

15    attacks by the Muslims upon the Serbian civilian population, and we

16    require the Prosecution's response to that as soon as possible because,

17    unfortunately, the submissions came later than we thought they would, and

18    this is an issue which probably will arise with the first witness.

19            Have you given any consideration to that yet?

20            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I've been occupied with witness

21    preparation last evening.  I've read the motion, and I will have papers to

22    the Court tomorrow.

23            JUDGE HUNT:  Tomorrow may be too late, if I may say so, because we

24    are going to have it arising with the first witness in cross-examination,

25    I would think.


Page 96

 1            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I'd ask that we hear the witness's

 2    testimony.  I'm not sure it will.  But if it does, I'd be prepared to

 3    argue it orally at this time.

 4            JUDGE HUNT:  Very well.  Mr. Domazet has sent a note to say that

 5    the accused's family is not here.

 6            Is that so, that the accused's family will not be here at any

 7    time, Mr. Domazet?

 8            MR. DOMAZET:  Yes, Your Honour.  I think this week.  Next week it

 9    is sure that they ...

10            JUDGE HUNT:  That they will or will not be here.

11            MR. DOMAZET:  No, they will not.

12            JUDGE HUNT:  Well, there's obviously somebody in there who is -- I

13    actually see some of our legal officers in there at the moment.  They've

14    probably taken possession.

15            Now, Mr. Domazet, this question of pleading to the amended

16    indictment.  It is a formal matter, of course.  I assume that your client

17    will be pleading not guilty to each of the charges directed to him.

18    Unless you have some objection to it, I propose simply to ask him does he

19    plead guilty or not guilty to all the charges pleaded against him, and we

20    can take a global answer.  Have you any problem with doing it that way?

21            MR. DOMAZET:  Yes, Your Honour, I agree.

22            JUDGE HUNT:  You agree with that way.

23            MR. DOMAZET:  Yes.

24            JUDGE HUNT:  Thank you very much.

25            Well, Mr. Vasiljevic, you should stand up, please.


Page 97

 1            There has been an amended indictment filed.  It, in fact, reduces

 2    the extent of the charges against you, but nevertheless, there are a

 3    number of charges there against you.

 4            You pleaded not guilty to the original indictment.  I therefore

 5    ask you:  Do you plead guilty or not guilty to each of the charges in the

 6    amended indictment pleaded against you?

 7            THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] Your Honour, I plead not guilty.

 8            JUDGE HUNT:  Thank you, sir.  Sit down, please.

 9            Mr. Groome, are you satisfied with that as a satisfaction of

10    technicalities?

11            MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.

12            JUDGE HUNT:  Very well.  Then now we'll hear what you want to say

13    by way of opening.

14            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, there is just one matter that I want to

15    raise.  This is Mr. Tanaskovic's first appearance before the Court.  I

16    would just -- given the serious situation that faces some of the

17    witnesses, I would just ask has he read the Court's orders regarding

18    protective measures and is he familiar with them?

19            JUDGE HUNT:  That's a matter I think you can deal with outside the

20    courtroom.  I must assume that they will comply with the rules and that

21    Mr. Domazet, who has quite some experience in this Tribunal, will ensure

22    that he has read the orders.  But I don't think it's necessary for me to

23    ask him formally in court.

24            Are you giving evidence, Mr. Groome?

25            MR. GROOME:  I was told this is where I could give my opening.


Page 98

 1            JUDGE HUNT:  I've never seen it done that way before.  That's the

 2    witness box.  But if you want to do it from there, you're welcome to do

 3    so, provided we can hear you.  You better turn the microphones on.

 4                          [Prosecution Opening Statement]

 5            MR. GROOME:  May it please the Court, all they wanted to do was to

 6    leave.  All they wanted to do was to leave Visegrad.  By the 14th of June,

 7    1992, the ethnic cleansing operation in Visegrad was well underway.  It

 8    was as widespread as it was brutal.  Most of the town's Muslims who had

 9    already fled once in fear, only to return, had now fled for a second and

10    final time.  Those who remained were among the last to believe what they

11    hoped to be impossible had now come to pass.

12            On the 13th of June, a Serb from Koritnik walked over to his

13    Muslim neighbours and announced with surprising straightforwardness, "You

14    have to leave.  You are being ethnically cleansed.  You must leave for

15    Kladanj."  These last remaining Muslims of Koritnik, finally resigned to

16    the awful reality around them, they agreed to leave.

17            When they crossed the old Turkish bridge in Visegrad on the 14th,

18    they were simply looking for the Red Cross.  They had been told a bus

19    would be waiting for them to take them to safety.  There was no bus.  They

20    were told perhaps tomorrow.  Their great tragedy began when they met the

21    accused, Mr. Vasiljevic.  Mr. Vasiljevic is not the most infamous among

22    the Tribunal's indictees.  He is no powerful politician accused of the

23    grand plans of the carnage in Bosnia.  He is a simple waiter, one

24    generally liked by Muslims and Serbs alike.  But he is one who, by his own

25    hands, committed an act which is perhaps one of the single most horrific


Page 99

 1    and egregious affronts to humanity in the war, to the most innocent of

 2    victims.  Judge Hunt, Judge Janu, Judge Taya, on behalf of the Prosecutor,

 3    Ms. Carla Del Ponte, it is both my legal responsibility and my privilege

 4    to stand before you and to describe the evidence the Prosecution intends

 5    to present in this case against Mr. Vasiljevic.

 6            The crime I am speaking about began when Mr. Vasiljevic offered

 7    his help to these desperate, desperate people.  He led them to a specific

 8    house.  He told them to remain there the night.  They would be safe.  He

 9    issued them written authorisation to stay overnight.  He told them he

10    worked for the Red Cross, that they would be placed on a bus to safety the

11    first thing in the morning.

12            He would then participate with Milan Lukic and several others in

13    burning those people alive.  At least 65 people, mostly women and small,

14    helpless children, were forced into a house on the edge of a creek that

15    had already been prepared with highly flammable liquid and set on fire.

16    There was a small baby among them; she had yet to see her third day of

17    life.  Anguished cries from the dying echoed along that gully for two

18    hours after the match was first struck.

19            This was not the first time Mr. Vasiljevic and Milan Lukic had

20    killed Muslims.  They, along with others, had marched seven unarmed men to

21    the eastern bank of the Drina River and cowardly shot them in the back

22    until they had believed they had killed all of them.  One of those men was

23    an old colleague of Mr. Vasiljevic's.  His frantic pleas for mercy to his

24    old friend were silenced by a bullet to the back of his head.  The seven

25    men dropped into the river that day.  Fate spared two, who will recall


Page 100

 1    that day for you during the course of this trial.

 2            Your Honours, before I discuss the crimes themselves, I want to

 3    begin my remarks by describing, in a very cursory fashion, the historical

 4    context in which the accused committed these crimes.

 5            The former Yugoslavia, up until 1991, was a federal state

 6    comprised of six different republics.  One of those republics, Serbia,

 7    included autonomous provinces of Voyvodina and Kosovo.  After General

 8    Tito's death, the forces that originally held these republics together

 9    began to disintegrate, and with that came signs that Yugoslavia, as it had

10    existed for the last several decades, was in danger of coming asunder.

11            The increasingly Serb-oriented federal institutions, including the

12    Yugoslav People's Army engaged in a series of conflicts, first in

13    Slovenia, then in Croatia, and soon therefore in Bosnia - all of this an

14    attempt to create a new country, still called Yugoslavia, in the very

15    midst of the separating republics, bloodily carved in part from the land

16    of two of those republics a new Yugoslavia that would be run by and be

17    home to Serbs and their close allies the Montenegrins.  This plan,

18    conceived by Serb political leaders both in Serbia and in Bosnia, was

19    executed in a most brutal fashion by the Yugoslav People's Army working in

20    cooperation with special forces from the Serbian Ministry of Internal

21    Affairs and paramilitary groups funded by nationalist political parties.

22    They worked in close consultation with local political leaders and local

23    police.

24            The military operations of these Serb forces were coordinated and

25    systematic, and by the end of 1992, this campaign resulted in the deaths


Page 101

 1    or forced displacement of approximately 2 million non-Serbs, who were not

 2    welcome in this vision of an ethnically homogeneous Serbian state.

 3            The United Nations in a series of resolutions attempted to quench

 4    the burgeoning flames of inter-ethnic conflict.  It passed and implemented

 5    an arms embargo and the former Yugoslavia, which froze the military

 6    advantage of the Serbs and left the Bosnians unable to adequately arm

 7    themselves.  However, as a result of international pressure, the Yugoslav

 8    People's Army was forced to withdraw from Bosnia by the 19th of May,

 9    1992.  The withdrawal was in large measure illusory, as in fact

10    substantial numbers of army personnel and equipment remained in Bosnia to

11    seamlessly reinvent itself as a Bosnian Serb army called the Army of

12    Republika Srpska.

13            Visegrad.  Prior to the Bosnian conflict, Visegrad was a small

14    town in southeastern Bosnia and Herzegovina.  It is one of several towns

15    along the Drina River and today forms part of Republika Srpska.  Visegrad

16    has a number of features which ensured that it was of strategic importance

17    during the conflict.  First, the municipality is the site of an important

18    hydroelectric dam.  This dam not only provided essential electricity but

19    also controlled river levels and prevented flooding in areas downstream.

20            Second, the town was an important transportation hub.  It is

21    situated on the main road between Belgrade and Sarajevo; the primary road

22    connecting Titovo Uzice in Serbia and Gorazde and Sarajevo.  This road was

23    a vital link for the Uzice Corps of the Yugoslav People's Army with its

24    base camp in Uzamnica.

25            Your Honours, I'd like to draw your attention for the next couple


Page 102

 1    of minutes or minute or so to a photograph, an aerial photograph, and I'd

 2    like to point out some of the key locations that will come up in testimony

 3    here.  Let me start with perhaps the most famous of the features of

 4    Visegrad; and this is the old Turkish bridge which traverses the Drina.

 5            THE INTERPRETER:  Please speak into the microphone.

 6            JUDGE HUNT:  We will have to get a microphone around there so they

 7    can capture your remarks for the transcript.  You are probably speaking at

 8    a rate which is the upper limit of their capacity.  They are pretty good,

 9    but you are speeding a little.

10            MR. GROOME:  The Drina here runs north, so downstream is going up

11    this way, and this is the direction of north.  On the stone bridge, if you

12    recall, or if you take a look, in about the centre, it widens.  This is

13    the infamous sofa or the large stone seat where people would pass; as they

14    passed each other, would sit and talk with each other.

15            There is another bridge that crosses the Drina.  This is the new

16    bridge.  And there was one final bridge that crosses the Rez River

17    [phoen], and this is this bridge here, and you will hear about that.

18            This down here is the football stadium, and you will hear

19    testimony about 4.000 Muslims being gathered here one day to be

20    individually searched and intimidated.  Up in this area here is where the

21    two houses, the Pionirska street -- or the three houses that you will hear

22    testimony about on Pionirska street.  Perhaps the easiest way to find them

23    is to look across the street from this large, white building, which is a

24    school.  Down this area here is called the Bikavac settlement, and you'll

25    hear testimony about the men from the river Drina were hiding here for


Page 103

 1    several weeks and this is where they were apprehended the day they were

 2    brought to the Drina River.  As we come back full circle, we come to the

 3    centre of town down here.  And in here we have the hotel Visegrad, the

 4    police station, and the Panos restaurant is the restaurant where the

 5    accused worked and where most of the people knew him from.  There are a

 6    few items not depicted on this picture.  Let me just indicate where they

 7    would be, and you will hear them in the testimony here.

 8            There is the Uzamnica Barracks of the Yugoslav People's Army.

 9    That is on this bank, the eastern bank, or locals would call it the right

10    bank, of the Drina.  But it is further south, so it would be off to the

11    left of the photograph.

12            Also not depicted on the photograph would be the water dam, which

13    would be several kilometres upstream and would be off to the left on the

14    map.  And then the two other locations which are not depicted on the map

15    which you will hear testimony of, one is the place in Sase where the seven

16    men were taken to be killed.  That is located on the right or eastern bank

17    of the Drina River and is located north of the town several kilometres.

18            The one final location I'd like to indicate for you is the Hotel

19    Vilina Vlas, and that is northeast of the town and would be approximately

20    over here.  That is where the men were taken to the river.

21            Local Serb units began a mortar bombardment of the town and its

22    surrounding villages on the 6th of April, 1992.  Muslim neighbourhoods and

23    villages were predominantly targeted.  In retaliation, a small group of

24    Bosnian Muslim men seized control of that dam that I've just referred to,

25    and they threatened to blow it up.  As the Yugoslav army's circle around


Page 104

 1    the town grew closer, one of these men managed to release water from the

 2    dam, causing flooding to some houses and streets.  This crisis attracted

 3    considerable media attention, and leaders on both sides entered into

 4    intense negotiations.  Many residents, both Serb and Muslim, fled from the

 5    town to await the outcome of the crisis.

 6            The crisis at the dam was defused when JNA commandos seized the

 7    dam.  They were followed the next day by a large contingent from the Uzice

 8    Corps from the Yugoslav army which had crossed the border from Serbia.

 9    The Uzice Corps encountered some light resistance from Muslim factions but

10    ultimately had little difficulty in taking control of the town.

11            After taking control, the JNA positioned tanks and heavy artillery

12    around the town.  The JNA detained men and women for questioning.  Some of

13    these detainees reported being beaten.  After securing absolute control of

14    the town, JNA officers and Muslim leaders, persuaded by assurances from

15    the Yugoslav People's Army that Muslims would be safe, jointly led a media

16    campaign to encourage Muslims to come out from hiding, to return to their

17    homes, to return to their jobs.  Many did return, believing in the

18    assurances that they were given and naively hoping that life in Visegrad

19    could once again return to normal.  But soon after their return, they

20    learned that this Visegrad was worse, even more threatening than before.

21    Checkpoints manned by army, police, and paramilitaries seemed to be

22    everywhere.  People were robbed by police and paramilitaries and

23    threatened with their lives if they did not surrender their property.

24    Local Serbs were sent off for training and practice in shooting weapons.

25    Muslims with prominent positions in the town were fired; some


Page 105

 1    disappeared.  Paramilitaries drove around the town playing tapes of people

 2    being tortured, from loudspeakers mounted on the tops of their cars.

 3            This situation only became worse when the Uzice Corps left the

 4    town around the 19th of May, 1992.  Upon their departure, local Serb

 5    leaders established the Serbian Municipality of Visegrad and took control

 6    of the municipal government offices.  Soon thereafter, local Serbs,

 7    police, and paramilitary units began one of the most brutal campaigns of

 8    ethnic cleansing in the Bosnian conflict.  This was designed to

 9    permanently rid the town of its over 13.000 Bosnian Muslim residents.

10            During the period that followed, Serb and Bosnian Serb forces

11    attacked and destroyed a number of Bosnian Muslim villages.  Hundreds of

12    unarmed Muslim civilians in the town of Visegrad were killed for no other

13    reason other than their ethnicity.  The Drina was regularly used to dump

14    the bodies of men, women, and children who were killed along its banks or

15    on the historic Turkish bridge, a symbol for centuries of festering

16    animosity between Muslim and Serb peoples.  Many of these shockingly

17    mutilated bodies washed down the Drina, where they were caught by a sharp

18    bend in the river near the village of Slap.

19            Many Muslims who were not killed were detained at various

20    locations in town, including the JNA military barracks at Uzamnica.  Some

21    were detained in the Hotel Vilina Vlas or other makeshift detention

22    centres.  Here the victims were beaten, tortured and subjected to sexual

23    assaults.  Many were eventually killed.  Both of the town's two mosques

24    were completely destroyed.

25            During the spring of 1992, a former inhabitant of Visegrad, Milan


Page 106

 1    Lukic, returned to Visegrad and took control of a paramilitary unit which

 2    worked with the police and military units in exacting a reign of terror

 3    upon the local Muslim civilian population.  This paramilitary organisation

 4    was often referred to by locals as the White Eagles and included Milan

 5    Lukic's cousin Sredoje Lukic and his kum, Serbian word for "best man," the

 6    accused, Mitar Vasiljevic.

 7            Milan Lukic and Mitar Vasiljevic were good friends, and their

 8    families shared a special bond and relationship that extended over several

 9    generations.  Sredoje Lukic was a member of the Visegrad police, and Mitar

10    Vasiljevic was a well-known waiter that worked for the Panos company which

11    had several restaurants and coffee houses in the Visegrad area.

12            From April 1992 until October of 1994, Milan Lukic and his group

13    committed hundreds of crimes in the municipality of Visegrad against its

14    non-Serb population.  Many of his victims were thrown -- killed on and

15    thrown off the old Turkish bridge, most by the stone sofa.  From here the

16    bodies drifted down to Slap, where they were dragged in from the river and

17    given a semblance of a proper Muslim burial.

18            Sadly, the story of Visegrad is one of the most successful stories

19    of ethnic cleansing during the Balkan crisis.  Of its over 21.000 people,

20    over 61 per cent were Muslim.  During the war, after the events that you

21    will hear about at this trial, there were none left.  That is, over 12.000

22    people forcibly removed from their homes or killed according to the

23    records of the Red Cross.

24            Visegrad holds the tragic distinction of having the most number of

25    people who simply disappeared after Srebrenica, most of them men and


Page 107

 1    teen-aged boys, most of them in May and June of 1992, when the accused

 2    made his contribution to this evil scheme.

 3            Part of my legal burden is to prove that what Mitar Vasiljevic is

 4    accused of wasn't simply the work of a rogue band of criminals but was

 5    connected to the takeover and ethnic cleansing orchestrated by Slobodan

 6    Milosevic, Radovan Karadzic, and others.

 7            The Prosecution will introduce several pieces of evidence on this

 8    issue.  There are two in particular I would like to tell you about at this

 9    time.

10            You will hear from a man who was a prominent member of the

11    Visegrad community.  He will describe a chilling event in which he was

12    brought into the command post of the Yugoslav People's Army for a meeting

13    with an army colonel, and as he sat waiting at a table, three officers

14    unknown to him came in and sat at the table across from him.  Not

15    realising he was a Muslim, they ignored him.  One of them unrolled a map

16    of the town and pointed out to the other two the areas along the right

17    bank that had been successfully cleaned.  A paralysis overcame this man as

18    the officer pointed to the village in which his entire family lived on the

19    left bank of the river and declared that it was scheduled for cleaning the

20    very next day.

21            You're also going to see a video taken about five or six weeks

22    before these crimes were committed.  It was first aired on Serbian

23    television and begins with a camera crew filming Visegrad from an army

24    helicopter.  You will see the helicopter circle over an army facility on

25    which Muslims are gathered onto a concrete basketball court like sheep.


Page 108

 1            The video will continue, and you will see an army truck with armed

 2    soldiers in the back and a number of Muslims in the truck.  As the truck

 3    passes the camera, you can see their frightened, worried faces.  One of

 4    those frightened people will appear before you.  He will describe the day

 5    the army entered his village and collected all of the Muslims and brought

 6    them to the football stadium in town.  He will describe how, as he crossed

 7    the old Turkish bridge in the back of that truck that he was driving in,

 8    he became part of a line of army trucks also laden with frightened Muslim

 9    men, women, and children.  He will tell you how the paramilitaries,

10    including these White Eagles, waited at the end of the bridge, jeering and

11    threatening them, unchecked by the great number of army personnel.  He

12    will tell you the army made no effort to stop one of the White Eagles as

13    he took his friend's son from the truck in front of him, never to be seen

14    again.

15            I would like to describe in greater detail the crimes for which

16    the accused is about to stand trial.  Credible and reliable eyewitness

17    testimony will be adduced that on the 7th of June, 1992, Milan Lukic,

18    Mitar Vasiljevic, and other members of Milan Lukic's group detained seven

19    Muslim civilian men, drove them to the bank of the Drina River, and shot

20    at them.  Five of those victims died as a result of the shooting; two

21    escaped fatal injury by pretending to be dead.

22            The events leading to the shooting began at approximately 5.30 in

23    the evening of the 7th, when Milan Lukic and his men were conducting

24    house-to-house searches for Bosnian Muslim civilian men.  One of the first

25    men to be taken prisoner was forcibly taken from his own house, and as he


Page 109

 1    was being lead away, he meekly requested permission to give his daughter a

 2    good-bye kiss.  Milan Lukic said no.  When Lukic turned his back, he stole

 3    a last kiss from this little girl.

 4            The first two men they took prisoner were placed in the rear seat

 5    of a dark red Volkswagen Passat that Milan Lukic was known to drive and

 6    had been stolen from a Muslim businesswoman who was one of the first to be

 7    killed.

 8            At approximately the same time, six different men in Lukic's group

 9    were at other Muslim homes close to the Bikavac Hotel.  Two of the men who

10    were captured had lived for several weeks in the basement of a home,

11    hiding behind a cupboard every time they heard a car drive down the

12    street.  When one of these men saw his own car curiously rolling down the

13    street with its engine off, he stepped outside for a closer look, never

14    realising that several of Milan Lukic's men were making their way up the

15    hill behind where he was hiding.

16            Apprehended, they were held with Milan until Milan Lukic arrived.

17    They were brought to another house close by where they were joined by

18    several other unfortunate men who were unable to escape.  When Milan Lukic

19    arrived at this area, the Bosnian prisoners were searched and their

20    valuables and identification papers were taken.  Perhaps of the first

21    indication of Lukic's intentions was what he did with the identification

22    papers afterwards.  He threw them on the ground and kicked them into a

23    pile behind the door.  The men were then forced into two cars stolen from

24    Bosnian Muslims.

25            The two cars drove off down through the town, past the two


Page 110

 1    destroyed mosques in the direction of the Vilina Vlas Hotel, north-east of

 2    the town.  On the way, Milan Lukic stopped as people -- stopped next to

 3    people walking in the treatment, and he called out to them from the car,

 4    asked them what their name was to see if they were Muslims.  At one of the

 5    checkpoints that they passed through, he remarked to the police officer

 6    there, "I have hunted myself several balijas," a derogatory word used to

 7    describe Muslims.

 8            When the two cars filled with the Bosnian Muslim prisoners arrived

 9    at the closed and empty Vilina Vlas Hotel, they were met by the accused,

10    Vasiljevic, and other members of Milan Lukic's group.  The accused was

11    standing at the left of the lobby as they entered.  The accused was well

12    known to the victims from his many years of work as a waiter in several

13    restaurants and coffee houses owned by the Panos company in Visegrad.  One

14    of the victims, Meho Savovic, had been Vasiljevic's supervisor and his

15    mentor in the company.

16            The accused was dressed in an olive drab military uniform with a

17    red ribbon on the sleeve.  Both his black cap and uniform bore the

18    insignia of a double-headed eagle.  He was armed with an automatic rifle.

19    While the men were lined up with their backs to the reception desk, Mitar

20    Vasiljevic stood on their right while another Serb guard stood on their

21    left.  Milan Lukic rummaged through the reception desk in an futile

22    attempt to look for a certain set of keys.  He opened the door behind the

23    reception desk and looked there as well.  When he couldn't find the keys

24    he was looking for, he angrily exclaimed, "Let's go back."

25            The seven men were once again forced into the two cars.  The


Page 111

 1    accused, Vasiljevic, sat in the front passenger seat of the Passat as

 2    Milan Lukic drove.  The two vehicles drove to Sase, a small village just

 3    outside Visegrad and just along the bank of the Drina River.  On the way,

 4    one of the paramilitaries offered one of the men a cigarette and assured

 5    him, "You are being taken to be exchanged."

 6            As they pulled alongside the road in front of a house, Milan Lukic

 7    asked Vasiljevic if he knew whether the house was owned by Muslims.  He

 8    replied that it was.

 9            After the accused and the other paramilitaries got out of the car,

10    they assumed positions around the car and ordered the Bosnian Muslims

11    out.  Milan Lukic had a sniper's rifle with a sound suppressor or

12    silencer, and Mitar Vasiljevic had a locally made Kalashnikov-style rifle

13    like the other two men.  All of the guns, including the one held by

14    Mr. Vasiljevic, were trained on the men.

15            When the captives were out of the car, they were forced to walk

16    towards the Drina, which was approximately 100 metres away.  On the way to

17    the river, Milan Lukic and Mr. Vasiljevic guarded their condemned on one

18    side and the remaining paramilitaries guarded them from the other.  It was

19    clear to the men what fate awaited them.  One of them attempted to move

20    towards his brother-in-law as they walked to say a last good-bye.  He was

21    quickly threatened to walk straight ahead.

22            When they arrived at the river, the seven men were ordered to line

23    up along its bank.  The men walked the ten paces slowly towards the river

24    they swam in as boys, knowing that to reach it was to meet their death.

25    Vasiljevic's former supervisor, Meho Savovic, repeatedly begged the


Page 112

 1    accused to spare his life.  Vasiljevic coldly responded, "I don't know

 2    you."  Some of the others begged as well, but it was in vain.  Some of

 3    them were simply silent and spent what they thought was the last few

 4    moments of their life thinking about their children or the others they had

 5    loved.

 6            As the seven stood at the river's edge, Vasiljevic, Milan Lukic,

 7    and the other paramilitaries assumed positions approximately ten metres

 8    behind them.  After a brief discussion regarding whether to use the

 9    Kalashnikovs in automatic or semi-automatic mode, the sound of the three

10    guns could be heard as they were clicked into single shot.  The

11    paramilitaries, beginning with Milan Lukic, fired repeatedly into the

12    men's backs and into their heads until they believed they had killed all

13    of them.

14            Two of the victims threw themselves into the river when the firing

15    began and desperately pretended to be dead.  They remained still in the

16    shallow water as additional shots were fired into the bodies around and on

17    top of them to ensure that they had all been killed.  They could hear the

18    sound of the bullets thud into the bodies of their friends.  They could

19    feel life quickly leave the men lying on them as their movement stilled.

20            When the paramilitaries were satisfied that they had killed the

21    seven men, Vasiljevic, Milan Lukic, and the others returned to the two

22    cars and drove away.  The two survivors of the shooting remained

23    motionless until they heard the cars leave, and together they found their

24    way to safety.

25            For these crimes, Mr. Vasiljevic has been charged with murder as a


Page 113

 1    crime against humanity and as a violation of the laws or customs of war,

 2    the crime of inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, and finally the

 3    crime of violence to life and person as a violation of the laws or customs

 4    of war.

 5            The evidence of this incident will come from four sources,

 6    (redacted)

 7    (redacted)

 8            There will also be testimony from a man who was hiding on the

 9    opposite bank and observed the crime through a set of binoculars.  And

10    finally, by the accused's own account of what happened, I will talk in

11    greater length about his videotaped interview.  But for now I will just

12    say that he admits being present at all times during the crime beginning

13    from the Vilina Vlas hotel through the executions themselves and up until

14    Milan Lukic dropped him back at his home.

15            The fire.  Credible and reliable eye witness testimony will

16    establish beyond a reasonable doubt that on or before the 14th of June,

17    1992 approximately 65 to 75 people of Bosnian Muslim ethnicity, mostly

18    women and children, were imprisoned in a house on Pionirska street by

19    Mr. Vasiljevic, Milan Lukic, Sredoje Lukic, and then burned alive.  The

20    events leading up to the fire began as a group of people, mostly women and

21    their children from a small settlement called Koritnik, about six

22    kilometres outside of Visegrad, gathered in the town of Visegrad, seeking

23    the protection of the Red Cross and a way to leave the town.

24            Earlier in the day, one of their Serb neighbours told them

25    directly that the village was to be ethnically cleansed.


Page 114

 1            THE INTERPRETER:  Could counsel please slow down.

 2            MR. GROOME:  Some of these people had been instructed earlier in

 3    the day.

 4            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Groome, we've had another request to please slow

 5    down.  When you are reading, it's very natural for to you speed up.  I'm

 6    told I do it myself.  But just keep it in mind.  It has to be translated

 7    or interpreted and it has to be typed, so just space yourself out a little

 8    more, please.

 9            MR. GROOME:  Thank you.

10            Some of these people had been instructed earlier in the day by

11    people claiming to work for the Red Cross or a refugee committee that

12    there would be safe transportation out of the town.  The accused Mitar

13    Vasiljevic was among those who disseminated this false information and

14    falsely represented himself to be a member of the Red Cross.

15            Most of these people had been forced from their homes or had

16    determined that remaining in Visegrad imperiled their lives.  Finding the

17    Red Cross office closed, the group made its way to a Muslim neighbourhood

18    at the edge of Visegrad where they hoped to find shelter for the night.

19    As they approached the area, they were met by Vasiljevic, who introduced

20    himself by name and told them that he was working for the refugee

21    commission.  Most of them already knew him from his work in the Panos

22    restaurants.  Vasiljevic instructed the women to stay in the ransacked

23    house of Jusuf Memic on Pionirska street and issued them an official

24    looking certificate supposedly legitimising this arrangement.  He returned

25    one more time later in the day and assured them that they would be safe


Page 115

 1    there and that, in the morning, transportation would be arranged to carry

 2    them out from Visegrad.

 3            Shortly after Mr. Vasiljevic's second instruction to the group,

 4    Milan and Sredoje Lukic, the men that he had worked with in the past, as

 5    well as another from that group, arrived.  They stole valuables from the

 6    group, questioned them about their husbands, and then made them strip

 7    naked for a final, humiliating search.  When they finished, they again

 8    instructed them, as Vasiljevic had done before, they were to remain in the

 9    house until morning.

10            Later that day, Milan and Sredoje Lukic returned to the house and

11    forced the shoeless victims to move to another house behind the first

12    house, a house owned by Adem Omeragic.  This house was only 20 to 50

13    metres away and was closer to the stream that ran behind the houses.

14            There were already a number of persons detained in this house, and

15    the group from the Memic house had to be physically squeezed into the

16    Omeragic house.  It was clear to one of the witnesses when she entered

17    that the carpet had been soaked with some volatile chemical and the

18    windows had been barricaded.  The chemicals smelled like glue and it made

19    it difficult to breathe.

20            After approximately 30 minutes, Milan and Sredoje Lukic and

21    Vasiljevic came back to the house and opened the front door.  As

22    Vasiljevic and Sredoje Lukic stood at Milan Lukic's sides preventing

23    anyone from escaping, Milan Lukic placed an explosive device on the carpet

24    and lit its fuse.  As the device exploded, it ignited the flammable

25    substance on the floor.  The flames quickly engulfed the solvent-soaked


Page 116

 1    socks of the victims and the house itself.  Vasiljevic and the Lukics

 2    remained outside the house, shooting at any of the people who desperately

 3    tried to escape through the windows.

 4            One woman and her son climbed out of the window and fled along the

 5    creek bed.  Another young boy showed him mother to that very same window

 6    and jumped out first and ran as quickly as he could down the creek bed and

 7    up to a small hill across the creek.

 8            He did not see his mother climb out after him.  He did not see

 9    when she was shot by Milan Lukic.  She rolled down the embankment of the

10    stream, limp from her wounds.  As she lay there, she listened to the

11    horrifying screams of the victims as they burnt to death.

12            Her son on the crest of that hill could not see her and cried as

13    he watched the house burn, listening to the screams of his many burning

14    relatives, believing that his mother was among them.  It would not be

15    until 1995 that he would learn that his mother had survived that

16    Holocaust.  The two Memic houses were also burned to the ground that

17    night.

18            For these crimes, Mr. Vasiljevic has been charged with

19    extermination, murder, both as a crime against humanity and as a violation

20    of the laws and customs of war, the crime of inhumane acts as a crime

21    against humanity, and finally the crime of violence to life and person as

22    a violation of the laws and customs of war.  There is also an overall

23    charge of persecution regarding the totality of the accused's conduct.

24            The Pionirska evidence.  The evidence of what happened on

25    Pionirska street will come from a number of sources.  Remarkably, seven


Page 117

 1    people escaped the fire that day.  As the women were moved from the Memic

 2    house to the Omeragic house, two sisters, two twins, dropped behind a shed

 3    as they passed by -- as they passed by the shed as the group was forced

 4    into the second house.  They will describe their observations of the fire,

 5    the crime in general, and in particular their observation of the accused,

 6    Mr. Vasiljevic, and his participation in the crime.

 7            Of the approximately 70 people that were forced into the house --

 8    I'm sorry, of the people that escaped, two mothers and their sons were

 9    able to climb out of the window and jump to the ground.  They will come

10    and testify about their ordeal and the role the accused played in the

11    crime.  An elderly man also survived the fire that night, a man who knew

12    and identified Mr. Vasiljevic very soon after the fire.  Although he died

13    in 1995, we will call his son to recount what his father told him about

14    the fire that night.

15            Your Honours, I would like to draw your attention to another

16    enlarged photograph - this is an aerial photograph of the Pionirska street

17    houses that are relevant to this trial - and just point out a couple of

18    things.  These two houses here are the houses that belong to the Memics.

19    They are most easily identified by the northerly one which has a green and

20    yellow awning at this point in time, and as you can see, they are directly

21    across from the large, white school which can be seen on the broader

22    shot.

23            These houses were burned that night, but these are not the houses

24    where the women were forced into and burned.  That is this house back

25    here, this shell of a house back here.  And in particular, the witnesses


Page 118

 1    will talk about this bottom, ground floor with no windows on this side,

 2    simply windows facing the creek which runs along, through, or under the

 3    shade of these trees.

 4            The ashes of these and remains of the dead are still in and around

 5    that house.  And in a final act of desecration, the ground floor of the

 6    house was turned into a pig sty that -- today that hallowed ground lies

 7    covered in pig filth.

 8            From very early on in the Prosecution case, I think you will have

 9    a sense of just how well known Mr. Vasiljevic was.  You will hear ample

10    evidence regarding how the witnesses know Mr. Vasiljevic.  One woman will

11    tell you she has known him all her life.  They are about the same age.

12    They were born in the same area.  As young adults, they used to frequent

13    the same places, and she, like the rest, knew him from the Panos

14    restaurants and cafes.

15            One of the witnesses will tell you how often he frequented the

16    cafe where Mr. Vasiljevic worked and will estimate that he has seen Mitar

17    Vasiljevic hundreds of times over the course of the last several years,

18    prior to 1992.

19            At least one of the defences in this case, perhaps the primary

20    defence, is that the accused was not present when the fire was actually

21    set in Pionirska street.  Because this necessarily raises the issue of

22    whether or not the witnesses were mistaken, the Prosecution undertook to

23    conduct identification procedures in this case.  The format of the

24    identification procedure was a photo array.  I have placed one of these

25    arrays on the ELMO, and I would ask if we can see that now.


Page 119

 1            Each witness, along with the investigator and interpreter, was

 2    asked to view a set of pictures.  The photo array contained a picture of

 3    the accused along with a number of other men of similar appearance, one of

 4    which was a recent photograph of the accused.  They were asked if they

 5    recognised anyone.  If they did, they were asked who they recognised it to

 6    be.  They were then asked to sign their name to the photograph they

 7    recognised.  The investigators will testify and describe the steps they

 8    took to ensure that the identification procedure was fair.  And you will

 9    hear from the witnesses themselves, describe the circumstances under which

10    they were shown the photo spread and the level of certainty they had in

11    identifying the picture that they did.

12            An alibi defence has been raised in relation to Pionirska street.

13    The accused in his video statement claims that on the day of the 14th, he

14    fell off a horse in the centre of town.  He says that he found the horse

15    abandoned northeast of the town and rode it into the town to release it

16    along the railroad tracks and in the very centre of town, the horse

17    slipped, threw him --

18            JUDGE HUNT:  I couldn't read the signature there, but in case

19    somebody could, is that a witness who has protective measures in his or

20    her favour?

21            MR. GROOME:  No, Your Honour.  Sorry, Your Honour, it is a witness

22    who has protective measures.

23            JUDGE HUNT:  I suggest you don't show it on the ELMO any more

24    unless you want it somehow in private session.  But I think we've seen

25    enough of it.


Page 120

 1            MR. GROOME:  Yes.  At the very centre of the town, the horse

 2    slipped, threw him, and then fell on top of him, breaking his leg.  And

 3    sure enough, there are medical records from Uzice hospital which indicate

 4    that a person by the name of Mitar Vasiljevic was admitted into the

 5    hospital that night at approximately 11.00 p.m., here in this book.  Some

 6    jurists might be tempted to end the inquiry here.  It is a seemingly

 7    impressive piece of evidence, and there is no obvious evidence that it was

 8    forged or tampered with.  But the victims of this fire are owed more than

 9    a cursory look, a summary decision about this piece of evidence important

10    to the case.

11            This big blue ledger was not the only item contained in the

12    medical records.  You will hear about all of the documents contained in

13    the records and the circumstances under which they came into the

14    possession of OTP.

15            If this inquiry is to be a complete one, then they all must be

16    examined carefully.  In one of the admittance records, a doctor or nurse

17    noted where the person had broken his leg and it said, "the battlefield."

18    In the box for indicating who was notified of the person's injury, there

19    is an indication that a military post was notified.

20            There was also an x-ray film of the person's broken leg.  Written

21    across the bottom of the x-ray, very clearly, is the name Mitar Vasiljevic

22    and the date, 14 June 1992.

23            You will hear testimony from Dr. DeGrave, an expert in the

24    comparison of x-rays.  He will describe how he had the opportunity to

25    conduct a physical and radiological exam of the accused this past August.


Page 121

 1    He will also describe his analysis and comparison of an x-ray of the

 2    accused's leg taken here in the prison with the one that was part of the

 3    medical records.  He will tell you that, to a scientific certainty, the

 4    leg depicted in the x-ray from the Uzice hospital is not the same person

 5    as the accused.

 6            You will hear from two women that helped one of the survivors of

 7    the Pionirska street fire.  They tended her burns and injuries soon after

 8    the fire.  You will hear them describe their encounter with Mr. Vasiljevic

 9    after they saw the woman who survived the fire.

10            Your Honours, this process we embark on this morning will

11    hopefully lead us to the truth of what Mr. Vasiljevic's participation was

12    in the Pionirska street fire.  The Prosecution's role in that process has

13    been to thoroughly investigate this matter and gather relevant evidence.

14    I think at the conclusion of the Prosecution's case, you will see that

15    this has been done.  And in that search for evidence, evidence was

16    discovered that suggest that these records are not what they seem.  That

17    will be presented.

18            There is also evidence that suggests that perhaps the accused was

19    indeed in that hospital.  That evidence was promptly turned over to

20    Mr. Domazet, Defence counsel for the accused, and I trust that he shall

21    present that evidence in turn.

22            All the Prosecution ask of Your Honours at this juncture is to

23    reach no hasty conclusion, forge no theory about what happened, until you

24    have heard all of the evidence and both counsel have had an opportunity to

25    address you.


Page 122

 1            Further in relation to Defence assertion that Mr. Vasiljevic is

 2    not guilty because he was not present when the fire was ignited, I would

 3    say the following:  Your Honours, Mr. Vasiljevic did not begin his part in

 4    this crime when he shone a flashlight on the victims so Milan Lukic could

 5    shoot them.  His part in this crime did not begin when he guarded the door

 6    as Milan Lukic knelt to ignite the carpet under the feet of the victims.

 7    His part did not start when he helped move them from the house on the road

 8    to the house where they died.  This crime began when he told the victims

 9    to go stay in that first house.  This crime began when he issued a

10    supposed official document authorising them to stay in this house.  This

11    crime began when he told them he worked for the Red Cross and they would

12    be safe there that night.

13            It is just common sense that perpetrators of crimes tell lies to

14    their victims.  The kidnapper tells the young child that he has candy for

15    her.  Why, even the first murder recorded in the Bible, Cain invited his

16    brother Abel to go for a walk, to lure him away to be killed.  Like so

17    many crimes before, the victims of this fire were told lies to overcome

18    their resistance to what Mr. Vasiljevic and the two Lukics had planned for

19    them.  I draw your attention to them in advance.  They will be important

20    in this case.  You will hear evidence that not only in the Pionirska

21    street but also in the Drina river, you will hear a witness describe an

22    event that she witnessed in which she saw Mr. Vasiljevic take a young

23    little girl who was crying for her father and put the little girl up on

24    his lap.

25            THE INTERPRETER:  Could counsel please slow down for the


Page 123

 1    interpreters.  Thank you.

 2            JUDGE HUNT:  Yes, another complaint.  I realise you're probably

 3    trying to finish this speedily, but we'd rather have it taken properly by

 4    the interpreters and the court reporters.

 5            MR. GROOME:  He cuddled this small girl who was crying for her

 6    father.  He consoled her with a smile and told her that her dad had been

 7    taken to be exchanged.  Her father's butchered body was one of the ones

 8    that washed up in Slap.

 9            Your Honours, I suspect that it is quite possible at some point in

10    this case you may be struck by the idea that this case really isn't about

11    whether these witnesses are mistaken when they saw Mr. Vasiljevic commit

12    those horrific acts on the 14th of June.  You just may conclude that they

13    could not be mistaken; they know him too well.  You may be drawn to the

14    dilemma that this case isn't about mistake, it's about some person or

15    persons attempting to perpetrate a fraud upon this Tribunal.  Someone must

16    not be telling the truth.

17            In that likelihood, I would ask, as we begin to hear testimony

18    today, that you closely assess the credibility of each and every witness

19    for the Prosecution.  Consider the risks that they have accepted to come

20    to tell you what Mr. Vasiljevic did.  Consider the magnitude of how

21    difficult it is to relive that night here in court.  Look carefully into

22    their eyes and see the scars from the fire that night and ask yourself

23    whether or not you believe them.

24            In 1961, a native Visegradian by the name of Ivo Andric won the

25    Nobel Prize for literature for his famous book, "The Bridge over the


Page 124

 1    Drina," a book about this bridge, this town, and these people.  He

 2    describes the bluish green Drina rushing northward out of the precipitous

 3    gorge and the old, stone Turkish bridge which traverses it, connecting its

 4    flattened banks where the town of Visegrad was founded so many years ago.

 5    He describes life there among the Serbs, Muslims, and Croats and how from

 6    time to time an inexplicable madness descends like a poisonous fog on the

 7    town, dividing its several peoples and giving birth to egregious acts of

 8    violence, many of them, and the cold stone seat of the bridge, that

 9    sacrificial altar to an insane god of nationalism.

10            Why, in June of 1992 Mitar Vasiljevic and the Lukics decided to

11    write the next chapter of that book, a chapter far surpassing any one that

12    came before it in its complete and utter cruelty to the most innocent of

13    victims, we can never hope to understand.  Fortunately, the law does not

14    impose upon me the burden of proving what compelled Mr. Vasiljevic to

15    commit these acts.  The law does impose upon me the burden of proving that

16    he did in fact intentionally commit these crimes, a burden that will be

17    satisfied completely by the evidence that will be presented over the

18    coming weeks.

19            They just wanted to leave.  Thank you.

20            JUDGE HUNT:  Now that you're back at your usual position,

21    Mr. Groome, may I ask you just two questions?  What was the street in

22    which the burnt house is to be found?  Was it Pionirska, or if it was,

23    what is the street in which the other buildings are shown, the ones

24    opposite the school?  Because we are going to get into terrible trouble if

25    we keep on referring to this as the Pionirska street incident.


Page 125

 1            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, this is Pionirska street here.

 2            JUDGE HUNT:  All right.  That's where the house was when they were

 3    first put.

 4            MR. GROOME:  First brought.  The other house isn't on the street.

 5    It's essentially in the backyard of these houses here.

 6            JUDGE HUNT:  You see, I was tempted at first to call them the

 7    first and the second house, but then we are going to get into trouble

 8    because of the way in which you have drafted the indictment, because there

 9    is another house in Pionirska street that was burnt -- no, in another

10    street that was burnt.  It's referred to throughout as the second house.

11            MR. GROOME:  May I make a suggestion, Your Honour?

12            JUDGE HUNT:  Yes.

13            MR. GROOME:  That we call these two houses the Memic houses.  They

14    were owned by the Memics.

15            JUDGE HUNT:  No, please let's keep it either a street number or

16    the street name, but the names of people are very difficult to keep in

17    mind.

18            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, unfortunately, in this part of the

19    world, this house did not have a street number or even a street.  You must

20    walk through the backyard to get to it.  It's just on a creek bed.

21            JUDGE HUNT:  Can we call that the backyard house?  It's just much

22    easier to have names.

23            MR. GROOME:  Call it the house by the creek?

24            JUDGE HUNT:  House by the creek?  All right.  Don't mind.

25    Whichever way you like.


Page 126

 1            The other question I wanted to ask you:  It appears you are

 2    grasping the nettle, as it were.  You're going to deal with the alibi in

 3    the Prosecution's case in chief, are you?

 4            MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.

 5            JUDGE HUNT:  Yes, that's all right.

 6            Now, Judge Taya would like to ask a question.

 7            JUDGE TAYA:  I want to have some clarification from the

 8    Prosecution.  As to the house-burning incident on Pionirska street,

 9    according to the opening statement of the Prosecutor, there are already a

10    number of persons in the house of Adem Omeragic when approximately 65

11    Bosnian Muslims arrived there.  As to those persons who were already in

12    the house of Adem Omeragic, is it the allegation of the Prosecutor that

13    they were also detained there by the accused, Milan Lukic, Sredoje Lukic

14    and others?  This is my question.

15            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, unfortunately we know very little about

16    those people.  Those people were not from the village of Koritnik.  The

17    victims in this case from the village of Koritnik did not recognise them.

18    I think there will be a reasonable inference that they -- it was all part

19    of the same conduct by Mr. Lukic and Mr. Vasiljevic, but there will be no

20    evidence about the identity of those people or how they came to be in that

21    house.

22            JUDGE TAYA:  Thank you.

23            JUDGE HUNT:  Well, you may call your first witness.

24            What are we going to do about all of the documents that we're

25    eventually going to get?  I assume we're going to be given some documents,


Page 127

 1    are we?

 2            MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.

 3            JUDGE HUNT:  When?

 4            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour called my assistant Friday afternoon, and

 5    I believe they were prepared the same day.

 6            JUDGE HUNT:  I made no calls, but certainly one of the legal

 7    officers did because usually we get them in advance.  Are we going to be

 8    given a copy of each of these documents?

 9            MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.

10            JUDGE HUNT:  How have you got them identified in the folders?

11            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, they're in the order that we intend to

12    refer to them.  They've all been pre-numbered.  I was going to ask for a

13    few minutes with the clerk of the court to decide whether we pre-mark them

14    all for identification at this juncture or we do it as we call upon the

15    exhibit.

16            JUDGE HUNT:  It will be sufficient if you just leave the numbers

17    on it.  We will use those numbers as exhibit numbers for ease of

18    reference.  If any are not tendered or not admitted into evidence, then we

19    just simply will not have any exhibits of that number.

20            I don't think it's necessary to mark them for identification as

21    such.  There will be some documents which will be marked for

22    identification which won't get into evidence immediately, perhaps because

23    some other witness has to establish their authenticity.  But if you have

24    numbers on the documents, we'll keep to those numbers.  At this stage,

25    they are simply numbered documents, but we will use those numbers for the


Page 128

 1    exhibit numbers.

 2            They're going to be tendered when you call the investigator, are

 3    they?

 4            MR. GROOME:  Some, and some will be referred to when the witnesses

 5    testify.

 6            JUDGE HUNT:  We haven't seen the investigators' names on the list

 7    yet, so I assume that some of these witnesses will be referring to plans

 8    or streets, maps, or something like that, will they?

 9            MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.

10            JUDGE HUNT:  Well, could we have those at some stage before the

11    witnesses come?

12            MR. GROOME:  They can be provided for you right now.

13            JUDGE HUNT:  Well, perhaps during the morning adjournment you can

14    physically supply them to us.  Let's see how we go with your first witness

15    though.

16            MR. GROOME:  Can I ask for just a couple of minutes to rearrange

17    the witness box and recover some of the evidence?

18            JUDGE HUNT:  Yes, most certainly.  And you can take that down so

19    the interpreters can see what's going on inside the courtroom.  They do

20    really need to see.

21            The technical people will be pleased to set up the witness box

22    again after you've destroyed its virginity.  I'm sure it's the first time

23    it's ever been used by counsel for an address.  So it won't take long.

24    The technical people can come in and fix up the microphones.

25            Who is your first witness?  I gather there is some problem with


Page 129

 1    your witness list.

 2            MR. GROOME:  VG022, Your Honour.

 3            JUDGE HUNT:  Now, this witness is going to have facial distortion

 4    and a pseudonym.  Yes, very well.

 5            When you are doing your list, it would be very helpful if you did

 6    it the same way as the one we received on Friday noting what the

 7    protective measures are, because otherwise we have to go searching through

 8    the books.

 9            Are we getting somebody from the audio-visual group to come and

10    fix the microphones, or are we allowed to do them ourselves?

11            Mr. Groome, I notice there's a reference there that this witness

12    is expected to give us some idea of the political situation after the

13    multi-party elections.  How far are we going to go into this?  It really

14    only invites what the Defence wants to do, to run the line that it was an

15    attack by the Muslims upon the Serbs.  Why do we have to go into so much

16    detail?

17            MR. GROOME:  I'll ask him to give a very brief description of

18    this.

19            JUDGE HUNT:  Yes, I know.  But a very brief description is going

20    to invite, then, a brief description about something else.  You've got an

21    admission there was an armed conflict at the relevant time.  We can assume

22    that.  Somebody, I assume, will give us a brief history which will support

23    your opening address how the former Yugoslavia split up.  I don't know

24    what more we need, except, of course, you have to prove that it was an

25    international armed conflict if you're still pursuing that particular set


Page 130

 1    of charges.  Most of the smaller cases such as this, that has been

 2    dropped, and I'm still hoping that you might see some common sense about

 3    that.

 4            But what we are going to end up doing is a long argument about

 5    meetings, political rallies, and what was said in parliament and all of

 6    this, and I'm at a loss myself to know why we need that.  All we have to

 7    prove -- all we have to have proved for us is that there was an attack

 8    upon the Muslim civilian population.

 9            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, the witness will not be going into the

10    items that you've just mentioned.

11            JUDGE HUNT:  That will be a relief, because I've heard them so

12    often now when Prosecutions have forced it on us.

13            Is the witness ready?  Yes, bring him in then.

14            MR. GROOME:  Just a point of clarification.  There were no

15    Article 2 points on this indictment.

16            JUDGE HUNT:  Aren't there?  I thought that there was some

17    discussion in the pre-trial brief about the Geneva Conventions.

18                          [The witness entered court]

19            JUDGE HUNT:  Now, sir, will you stand up to take the solemn

20    declaration that the usher is showing you?  Please stand up so that the

21    usher can show you the solemn declaration.

22            THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] I solemnly declare that I will speak

23    the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

24            JUDGE HUNT:  Sit down, please, sir.

25                          WITNESS:  WITNESS VG22


Page 131

 1                          [Witness answered through interpreter]

 2            JUDGE HUNT:  Who is taking this witness?  Mr. Groome.

 3            MR. GROOME:  May I have a moment, Your Honour?

 4                          Examined by Mr. Groome:

 5       Q.   Good morning.  Can you hear me?  Good morning.  Can you hear me?

 6            JUDGE HUNT:  Just say yes so we can hear you.

 7            THE WITNESS:  Yes.

 8            MR. GROOME:

 9       Q.   I'd ask you to take off your jacket.  You're going to be here

10    awhile.  Get yourself comfortable, please.

11            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Groome, have you got what has generally been

12    described as a pseudonym sheet that shows his name and address or his name

13    and age and place of birth, which also shows his pseudonym?

14            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I have a list of all names and all the

15    pseudonyms that have been assigned in this case.  I do not have the

16    biographical information on it.  If you like, I will provide that for you

17    this afternoon.

18            JUDGE HUNT:  The way I have found it always to be done - and it is

19    far more helpful if it is done this way - is that for each witness, you

20    provide a sheet of paper which has his name and whatever identification

21    details you want in it, plus a reference to his pseudonym, and then he

22    knows that he will be referred to by that pseudonym.  And then you have on

23    that sheet of paper a list of all of those persons to whom he may refer

24    who have pseudonyms.  You can't expect every witness to go through a whole

25    list of pseudonyms to work out whether somebody he's going to mention is


Page 132

 1    on that list.

 2            MR. GROOME:  I don't expect that of witnesses, Your Honour.

 3            JUDGE HUNT:  Well, how is he going to know, when he refers to

 4    somebody by name, that he shouldn't refer to that person by name but by a

 5    pseudonym?

 6            MR. GROOME:  He's not going to refer to anybody that he shouldn't

 7    refer to by name, Your Honour.

 8            JUDGE HUNT:  All right.  But for the other witnesses, do you think

 9    we can do it?  It saves him having to write down on a piece of paper what

10    his name is, and we've got a document which goes in under seal as an

11    exhibit.

12            MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.  I will do that.

13            JUDGE HUNT:  And the numbering of those exhibits is going to have

14    to follow your numbering system.  So can you tell me how far your

15    numbering system goes at this stage?

16            MR. GROOME:  We're up around 55 at this stage, Your Honour.

17            JUDGE HUNT:  Let's start off, let's say, at 70.  So the first

18    pseudonym sheet or whatever other document you will want in will start off

19    at 70.

20            Now, you proceed, please.

21            MR. GROOME:

22       Q.   Sir, you have been assign the pseudonym VG22.  Are you ready to

23    proceed?

24       A.   Are you asking me?

25       Q.   No.  I'm telling you that you've been assigned number 22 and


Page 133

 1    asking are you ready to proceed.

 2       A.   Yes.

 3       Q.   I just remind you, as I told you yesterday, please do not use your

 4    name or any information about yourself which could identify you.

 5            JUDGE HUNT:  I'm sorry to keep on interrupting, Mr. Groome, but we

 6    have to know what his name is somewhere on the record.  That's the purpose

 7    of the pseudonym sheet that I suggested to you.  It's given to the

 8    accused's counsel and to us and to the witness.

 9            MR. GROOME:  I'm sorry, Your Honour.  I provided such a table with

10    the protective measures motion.  I assumed that that's what the Court

11    would be using this morning to coordinate the numbers with the names.  I

12    apologise, and we will have the sheet you're requesting.

13            JUDGE HUNT:  Thank you.

14            Now, sir, is that your name on that sheet of paper?

15            THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] Yes.

16            JUDGE HUNT:  Very well.  That will be Exhibit 70.  Show it to the

17    accused's counsel, please.

18            Proceed.

19            MR. GROOME:

20       Q.   Sir, I'd ask you to briefly describe your educational and

21    professional background.

22       A.   I completed primary school in Visegrad, secondary school.  I

23    graduated from the high school for air force studies in Mostar, and I

24    graduated from the faculty in Sarajevo.  After graduating, I worked in

25    Visegrad, in a local firm there.


Page 134

 1       Q.   And today what is your occupation?

 2       A.   Today I live in Sarajevo and I have a private business.

 3       Q.   I would ask you to describe for the Court what was the general

 4    political situation in Visegrad in 1992.

 5       A.   As has become common knowledge, in 1990 -- that is to say, in the

 6    former Yugoslavia and also in Bosnia-Herzegovina, the first multi-party

 7    elections were held.  Up until then, it was a one-party system with one

 8    party; that is, the Communist Party.

 9            After the multi-party elections were held, there were two parties

10    in Visegrad which gained the largest number of votes and seats and

11    deputies or members of parliament for the town of Visegrad.  Those parties

12    were the Party of Democratic Action and the Serbian Democratic Party, and

13    they made up the majority.  They had the power.  The other parties had

14    negligible influence and had a very small number of deputies in the

15    parliament.

16            In keeping with this, the results of the election, the power, and

17    the authority after the elections was set up.

18            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Groome, it's 11.00.  We'll take the break now.

19            I should have said that Exhibit 70 will be under seal.

20            We will resume at 11.30.

21                          --- Recess taken at 11.00 a.m.

22                          --- On resuming at 11.30 a.m.

23            JUDGE HUNT:  Yes, Mr. Groome.

24            MR. GROOME:

25       Q.   Sir, do you recall where we left off, or would you like to have


Page 135

 1    the last line of your testimony read back to you?

 2       A.   I do recall the point where we left off, and we may continue.

 3       Q.   Would you please continue?

 4       A.   As I was saying, power and authority in the municipality of

 5    Visegrad was divided up in percentages and commensurate with the

 6    multi-party election results.  The assembly of Visegrad numbered 50

 7    members of Parliament or deputies, and of that number, the SDA, the Party

 8    of Democratic Action, won 27 seats; the Serbian Democratic Party, the SDS,

 9    had 13 seats; and three or four other parties had the rest, making up the

10    50 number.  The SDA, the Party of Democratic Action, Serbian Democratic

11    Party, had wielded power and authority in the municipality to all effects,

12    with the majority.  The President of the municipal assembly was Mr. Fikret

13    Cocalic, and his assistant --

14            JUDGE HUNT:  One moment, sir.  We do not need this detail, do we?

15            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, some of these names will become relevant

16    later on in the trial.  I assure you that I will try to keep it as brief

17    as possible.

18            JUDGE HUNT:  The fact that, in effect, you're letting the witness

19    have his head worries me.  He has a story to tell, but very little of it

20    will be relevant to what we have to decide.  So just try to take him to

21    where you want him to go so we can get on.

22            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, in the interests of time, when I

23    prepared him yesterday, I asked him to tell briefly.  So rather than

24    interrupt him with questions on each point, I'd ask you to give us perhaps

25    a little leeway, and if you want me to start going point by point, I will.


Page 136

 1            JUDGE HUNT:  Well, if you assure us that it is going to be

 2    relevant, he can proceed, but I really do not want to know all of this

 3    history.  It is not relevant to anything we have to determine.

 4            MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.

 5       Q.   Please continue.  Would you please tell us just the main names of

 6    the heads of the two parties?

 7       A.   Very well.  The President of the Party of Democratic Action was

 8    Mr. Fikret Cocalic, and other influential members of the party were Omer

 9    Brankovic, Ohranovic Esad.  I myself was a member of that party.  The

10    President of the Serbian Democratic Party was Mr. Branimir Savovic and his

11    assistants were Stanko Pecikoza, Risto Perisic.  They were the most

12    influential people in the Serbian party.

13       Q.   I want to draw your attention now:  Did there come a time when

14    Muslim members of the Territorial Defence were disarmed?

15       A.   Yes, that did happen.  It happened somewhere in February or March

16    1992.  And how it happened was the following:  The Yugoslav People's Army

17    issued an order that all firms, companies, and institutions who had arms

18    in their possession intended for Territorial Defence purposes were to lay

19    down those arms and hand them into the army; that is to say, to the

20    Yugoslav People's Army.  And that's what happened during that period of

21    time.

22       Q.   And the company that you worked for at the time, were you a

23    prominent member in that company?

24       A.   I was the manager of that company, or director, and that company

25    had a significant stock of weapons and military equipment which was taken


Page 137

 1    over by the Yugoslav people's army.

 2       Q.   And did there come a time to your knowledge that people of Serb

 3    ethnicity were provided arms in Visegrad?

 4       A.   I am aware of that fact, yes, because a large number of people saw

 5    that taking place.  How it happened was that in -- that vehicles brought

 6    in weapons to Serb villages and those weapons were distributed amongst the

 7    Serb nationals or ethnic group.

 8       Q.   To your knowledge, were members of your company who were Serb,

 9    were they given any special military training around this time?

10       A.   At that time, practically all the employees in the company that I

11    was director of went for military training, and this military training was

12    conducted by the offices of the Yugoslav People's Army together with the

13    heads of the Territorial Defence who were Serbs by ethnicity.  This took

14    place on a training ground which was generally used for military training.

15       Q.   Could you describe for the Chamber when was the first incident of

16    violence or shooting incident in Visegrad?

17       A.   The first shooting took place on the 4th of April 1992, and it

18    happened some 10 or 12 kilometres away from the centre of town at a place

19    called Dobrun.  And I know for sure that it was in a quarry, a stone

20    quarry there, and the workers working in the stone quarry were shot at and

21    they left the quarry and came into town.

22       Q.   In the days after that initial shooting, were there mortar attacks

23    on Muslim areas of Visegrad?

24       A.   The first day was artillery shooting.  On the very next day, there

25    was mortar bombardment, and places inhabited by Muslims were shot at as


Page 138

 1    well as the centre of town.  And as the days went by, the shooting became

 2    more and more intense.

 3       Q.   I'd now like to draw your attention:  Did there come a time when

 4    approximately 12 Serbs were taken or captured by some of the Muslim

 5    members of the police force?

 6       A.   Yes, that's right.  This occurred on perhaps the 7th, 8th or 9th

 7    of April 1992.  It wasn't the Muslim police, but they were units of the

 8    police force, the police force that had already been in existence, and

 9    members of the Territorial Defence who were doing routine patrolling

10    around town, and they happened to come across an armed group of 12

11    individuals who were -- neither belonged to the police force or the army

12    or the Territorial Defence, and they arrested them, took them into

13    custody, and took them to the police station in town, where they held them

14    in detention.

15       Q.   Did you know these people?

16       A.   I knew most of them personally.  Some of those people who had been

17    taken into custody were members of the regular police force, 10 to 15 days

18    previously, in town; whereas some of the others were civilians until 10 or

19    15 days prior to the event.  And I knew them personally.  I knew where

20    they worked, what they did, that kind of thing.

21       Q.   And at the time they were taken into custody, were they dressed in

22    military uniforms?

23       A.   Yes.  Some of them had the police-type uniforms.  Others were

24    wearing military uniforms.

25       Q.   Now, I'm going to ask you to describe the events of the next five


Page 139

 1    days.  I'm going to ask you to go day by day, beginning with day one, the

 2    time when water was released from the dam.  Would you explain the

 3    circumstances surrounding the release of the water.

 4            JUDGE HUNT:  There is an admission of fact about this, is there

 5    not?  The document that was attached to the pre-trial brief is not signed,

 6    and I know there has been some problem about translations of it, but is

 7    that not an admitted fact?

 8            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, it may be.  And I guess --

 9            JUDGE HUNT:  I know you want to go further, but I'm just trying to

10    say you don't have to prove that it happened.

11            MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.  And it's not directly relevant to

12    the charges, but it does fill out the picture of what was going on in

13    Visegrad at the time, and I think it will be particularly important to

14    understand the context in which these crimes occurred.

15            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Groome, every time you talk about the picture and

16    the context, I become worried.  Unless it proves something, we are not

17    terribly interested in it.

18            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I have to prove a connection between

19    the events as --

20            JUDGE HUNT:  Yes.  Very well.  Then it is relevant.  You go

21    ahead.

22            MR. GROOME:

23       Q.   Will you please describe the beginning -- let's call this day

24    one, the day water was released from the dam, and tell us the

25    circumstances surrounding that.


Page 140

 1       A.   The water from the dam was released by a certain man called Murat

 2    Sabanovic, who came there at his own initiative with a group of men.  And

 3    the very act of releasing the water was geared towards preventing; that is

 4    to say, the threat that water would be released from the dam and the

 5    hydroelectric power plant was geared towards turning away the arrival of

 6    the Yugoslav People's Army units which were burgeoning towards the town of

 7    Visegrad.  They were coming in large numbers and from different

 8    directions.

 9       Q.   How did you become --

10       A.   But as they did not succeed in preventing the army from coming in,

11    I think what happened next was on the 12th of April -- that was the date

12    when he actually released the water from the dam, just before the arrival

13    of the troops, the army troops, before they reached the hydroelectric

14    power plant and the surrounding villages around the town.

15       Q.   Would you explain to us what would have happened had the water in

16    the dam all been released?

17       A.   Had all the water been released from the dam, I do not think that

18    anything major would have occurred, because downstream on the River Drina,

19    there was another dam which had been emptied previously.  So it would have

20    captivated that water.  But there would have been local damage in the town

21    and the villages bordering on the river.

22       Q.   What was the response of the people who lived in Visegrad to this

23    threat of the water being released?

24       A.   Well, it caused a great deal of fear and panic amongst the

25    population because they tied this in with the arrival of the army and the


Page 141

 1    release of the water.  And as there was fear generally, this made the

 2    situation worse.  So the fact of the water being released was -- tipped

 3    the scale in this balance of fear.  They were terribly afraid that if the

 4    water was released, everything would be inundated.

 5       Q.   Did members of the Muslim community flee from Visegrad in response

 6    to this threat?

 7       A.   Yes.  The town was left empty on threat that the water would be

 8    released.  And when a little of it was released, everybody left the town.

 9    The town was left completely empty by all its inhabitants.

10       Q.   And where did the Muslim members of Visegrad go to?

11       A.   The Muslims from Visegrad went, for the most part, in two

12    directions.  One direction was upstream towards the town of Gorazde, and

13    the other direction was downstream towards villages that were five or six

14    kilometres away from the centre.  Brstanica was one of them, and it was

15    the centre of this rallying of the population.  And a small part went off

16    to Priboj.

17       Q.   And did members of the Serb community also flee the town?

18       A.   Yes, they did.

19       Q.   And you mentioned that some water was released from the dam.  Is

20    that true?

21       A.   Yes, some of the water was released.  Not all of it, but some of

22    it was.

23       Q.   And what was the result of that water being released?

24       A.   The results weren't what people had expected them to be.  They

25    were very much afraid.  But what happened was that one of the villages


Page 142

 1    suffered mostly, the village where Murat Sabanovic in fact lived, the

 2    actual person who released the water; whereas the rest of the damage was

 3    not as great.

 4       Q.   Was there any loss of life?

 5       A.   No, there wasn't.  When this act took place, nobody lost their

 6    lives, no.

 7       Q.   But there was damage to property?

 8       A.   Yes, there was.  Quite a bit.

 9       Q.   Did there come a time when you were asked to negotiate on behalf

10    of the Muslim population or be involved in negotiations on behalf of the

11    Muslim population to try to reduce tensions in Visegrad?

12       A.   Yes.  Among other things, negotiations were called for.  The first

13    negotiations were called for by the SDS with respect to the release of the

14    12 people who had been taken prisoner.  After that, the Yugoslav People's

15    Army asked for negotiations, which took place in the barracks near

16    Visegrad, and I attended those meetings.

17       Q.   I'm going to draw your attention to the first negotiation.  Did

18    that occur on the day after the water was released from the dam?

19       A.   Yes.  Yes, after the water was released, the first negotiations

20    were held with the SDS at a place called Kosovo Polje, perhaps some two

21    kilometres out of town.

22       Q.   In which direction?

23       A.   Downstream on the right-hand bank.

24       Q.   That would be north of the town?

25       A.   North, yes.


Page 143

 1       Q.   Would you please describe for the Court what happened at that

 2    negotiation?

 3       A.   At the negotiations, the president of the SDS was to come.  His

 4    name was Branimir Savovic.  He was expected to arrive.  And on the other

 5    side, (redacted)  We came to that

 6    village.  Mr. Branimir Savovic did not arrive, but the negotiations were

 7    attended by the Vice-president of the SDS party, Stanko Pecikoza.

 8            We discussed the release of the people that had been taken into

 9    custody, and our side - if I can use that term - called for a ceasefire,

10    for an end to the mortars shelling Muslim villages and parts of the town,

11    and we said that two days later they would be released.

12            Stanko said that he didn't have the authority to go ahead with

13    anything like that.  And we sat around talking for a while because we knew

14    each other from before.  We knew each other quite well, in fact.  So we

15    discussed the situation.  This might have gone on for about an hour, and

16    then we all went our ways, having agreed upon nothing, decided nothing.

17       Q.   Can you describe for the Chamber, did you have difficulty arriving

18    at this place or returning back?

19       A.   As we had agreed to meet at that particular location and hold the

20    negotiations there, the SDS guaranteed safe conduct, that we would not be

21    shot at.  I told them which car we would be arriving in and other

22    information of that kind.

23            The only difficulties that we had was because of the water that

24    was released from the dam, because there were pebbles and sludge on the

25    road.  That was the only difficulty.  We found it difficult to reach the


Page 144

 1    location because of all the sludge and slush and stones on the road.

 2       Q.   I would like to move now to day three.  Did you have a meeting

 3    with a member of the Yugoslav People's Army?

 4       A.   After one or two days, the President, Mr. Cocalic, that Colonel

 5    Ojdanci, who was the commander of the Uzice Corps, wished to talk to the

 6    leadership of the municipality, and I said that I would go with them in

 7    view of the fact that (redacted)

 8    (redacted) and that's what happened.  That's how we went to the

 9    negotiations which had been scheduled to take place in a barracks called

10    Uzamnica on the right bank of the Drina, two to three kilometres upstream

11    and quite near the dam.

12       Q.   That would be south of the town?

13       A.   Yes, that's right.

14       Q.   And who else attended from the Yugoslav People's Army?

15       A.   On the part of the Yugoslav People's Army, there was the

16    commander, the local commander of the barracks, and his name was Captain

17    Borko.  But he didn't actually attend the negotiations.  He was just

18    there.  He would come and go for brief periods of time.  He would come in

19    and leave, but he didn't actually attend the negotiations.  There were

20    other members from the JNA and Colonel Ojdanic.

21       Q.   When you arrived at the Uzamnica barracks, was Colonel Ojdanic

22    present?

23       A.   No.  We arrived a little earlier.  Actually, we arrived on time,

24    at the scheduled time; whereas the colonel was a little late.

25            In the room where the negotiations were to be held, we came across


Page 145

 1    several JNA officers who were not from the barracks themselves, and

 2    amongst them there was an air force major, so we talked to them for a

 3    while while we were waiting for Colonel Ojdanic to arrive.

 4       Q.   Did anything occur between yourself and this major?

 5       A.   While we were waiting for the colonel - and we waited for

 6    approximately one hour - the major was very nervous and angry.  He was a

 7    little intoxicated.  And immediately after the talks started, which refer

 8    to the situation in Visegrad, he was angry, he beat the table with his

 9    fists, he hurled derogatory terms at our team.  I wasn't there alone.  I

10    was with some others.  So that it was all very unpleasant, and we were a

11    little taken aback by his behaviour.

12       Q.   At the time this meeting was being held, who is in control of the

13    dam?

14       A.   We went to the negotiations in the barracks via the dam, across

15    the dam, because there was no other way to reach the barracks.  There was

16    nobody there, just some of the workers who worked on the dam's

17    maintenance.  When the meeting with the colonel was over, on our return,

18    we were detained by soldiers of the JNA, so that means that in the

19    meantime, they had taken control of the dam.

20       Q.   Can you describe what happened when you were detained by these

21    soldiers?

22       A.   Well, standard procedure.  They had their weapons cocked at us.

23    We were told to get out of the car.  We were all travelling in small

24    passenger vehicles.  They searched the cars.  They searched us

25    personally.  And they asked us to go by military truck to see the


Page 146

 1    commander who was providing security for the dam.  He was Captain

 2    Vukosavljevic.  He was the dam commander.  We insisted on going in our own

 3    car and the captain came to see us.  That's what happened in the end.

 4    After we had explained who we were and where we were coming from and where

 5    we were going, he ordered the soldiers to let us pass, and they had to

 6    clear away the guns that had been positioned on the road that we had to

 7    pass through.  The soldiers didn't like having to do that, but they obeyed

 8    and got rid of the guns and we were able to pass by.

 9       Q.   This Vukosavljevic, over the course of the next several days, did

10    you have conversations with him regarding the situation in Visegrad?

11       A.   Yes.  In the following days, I had an opportunity to meet with

12    Captain Vukosavljevic on several occasions.  One night we stayed the whole

13    night in the dam.  Nobody slept.  We spent the entire night discussing the

14    situation, the current situation, and the causes of the situation, and so

15    on.

16       Q.   Did he tell you what he had been told about the situation in

17    Visegrad prior to his arrival in Visegrad?

18       A.   Yes.  Captain Vukosavljevic, at first, when we were captured, when

19    he arrived to let us go, he was extremely angry and he did not like us.  I

20    spent this evening, this whole evening, with him.  He asked me about the

21    overall situation in the town.  This was his major area of interest.  I

22    explained this to him.  I explained the actual situation, because I

23    realised that he obviously had a completely wrong picture of what had been

24    going on in the town.  And after that, he changed substantially.  And, in

25    fact, he did help us.  He met some of our requests.  So his relationship,


Page 147

 1    his attitude towards us, changed 100 per cent after this.

 2       Q.   What had he been told was happening in the town?

 3       A.   Well, he told me first of all that he had been transferred

 4    urgently from Macedonia, where he had served as an officer of the JNA, to

 5    Serbia, and then immediately to Visegrad, with the order to take the dam

 6    and to secure it.  He was also told that Muslims were committing horrible

 7    crimes there, slaughtering Serbs, roasting small children on spits, and so

 8    on and so forth.  And this was the preconception that he had when he

 9    arrived there.  After this talk with me, and I assume with some other

10    people of Serbian ethnic background, he realised that this was not the

11    actual real situation, that these were all things that had been invented

12    by somebody.  And then his attitude towards us changed.  When I said

13    "towards us," I mean the legal authorities and the Muslim community.

14       Q.   I want to now move to day four.  Were you called a second time to

15    have a meeting with Yugoslav People's Army representatives?

16       A.   On the first day of our meeting with Ojdanic, nothing really was

17    achieved, nothing special was achieved, because he wanted the

18    representatives of both parties present there, both of the SDA and the

19    SDS, the Democratic Action Party and the Serbian Democratic Party.  Since

20    members of the SDS were not present at the first meeting, he promised that

21    he would make sure that SDS members were present on the next meeting the

22    next day, together with the President, Brane Savovic.  So what was agreed

23    at the first meeting was that the second meeting would be held the next

24    day.

25            I arrived on time at that second meeting, but the other members


Page 148

 1    had not yet arrived because there was quite a lot of shooting around the

 2    town and it was quite unsafe to travel.  So the other members failed to

 3    arrive.  I entered the room, the same room where the meeting was held the

 4    day before.  I sat down at the table and waited for the other people to

 5    arrive.  Officers, two or three officers of the JNA, were there.  I said

 6    hello to them.  I sat down and we did not talk at any length.  And after a

 7    short while, another officer of the Yugoslav People's Army entered the

 8    room, carrying some military maps.

 9       Q.   Would there have been any way for these people to know who you

10    were?

11       A.   Well, if they had asked anyone who I was, somebody would have told

12    them that.  But I don't think that they knew.  They did not ask me

13    anything, so they did not know who I was.

14       Q.   Can you describe what happened when this third officer walked into

15    the room with the maps?

16       A.   The third officer brought the map, sat down at the table where I

17    was sitting, right across me, it so happened, because there was an empty

18    space there.  He spread the map on the table, so the map was right in

19    front of me.  In the beginning, I just looked at this whole thing.  I was

20    not really interested in the proceedings.  But then he explained to the

21    other officers how far each of the units from Uzice got, how far they

22    reached.  And now this topic really got my -- got me interested.  I was

23    looking at what he was pointing at at the map and listening to what he was

24    saying to the other officers.  He explained to them, very briefly, showing

25    them on the map the points where the units were, the points that the units


Page 149

 1    had reached, saying, "This whole area is clean."  "Another unit reached

 2    this such and such point.  This is all clean."  And so he went through the

 3    whole of the right bank of the river, indicating the points that the units

 4    had reached and saying, "This is all clean."

 5       Q.   Just to be clear, what is this a map of?

 6       A.   It was a military map.  I know what a military map looks like,

 7    because I had the opportunity to hold it in my hands.  There were blue and

 8    red arrows and signs.  I am not really familiar with those signs.

 9       Q.   Was it a map of Visegrad municipality?

10       A.   Yes, yes, yes, indeed.  It was a map of the Visegrad

11    municipality.  I knew every location.  I knew all those places that the

12    officer pointed out.

13       Q.   Please continue.  You were describing what the officer said about

14    the right bank.

15       A.   Yes.  And at one point, he circled a location on the left bank of

16    the river.  He circled an area, saying, "This area we will clean

17    tomorrow."  I saw this, and I know -- I knew what the word "to clean"

18    meant.  And he indicated an area where about 4.000 Muslims lived.  There

19    were several groups of villages there, including the village where my

20    father was born, and I knew that there were about 4.000 people there, and

21    the word "to clean" was a term that was used in the sense of to clean it

22    from -- of people, to remove all the people, to clean it in this sense.

23       Q.   You say that this place that was pointed to was a place that you

24    were familiar with.  Had you been to that place in the preceding days?

25       A.   Yes.


Page 150

 1       Q.   Was there any conflict going on in that area at the time?

 2       A.   No, no, there were no conflicts there.

 3       Q.   Please continue.

 4       A.   I was familiar with this location because my father was born there

 5    and my entire family, father, mother, brothers, sisters, their children,

 6    my wife, my children, were there.  They were all there.  And in the

 7    previous days, I had been going there, and I knew how many people there

 8    were.  There were so many people there.  It was crammed with people.  If I

 9    may be allowed to give you an image, my father could not sleep.  There was

10    no room for him to sleep in his own house.  They had to sleep elsewhere,

11    in the car.  So I knew just how many people there were, because I had been

12    visiting this area.

13       Q.   What happened then?

14       A.   Then I became paralysed, as we say in Bosnia.  I was unable to

15    move, because in a split second, I knew what the officer had pointed out.

16    I knew what "to clean" meant, and I knew what would happen, what he was

17    planning to do.  And because so many people were there, including my

18    entire family, I was paralysed for an hour.

19       Q.   Okay.

20       A.   And even after ten years, I don't feel comfortable describing

21    this.

22       Q.   Did there come a time when Colonel Ojdanic did arrive for the

23    scheduled meeting?

24       A.   When I insisted, in fact, I even cried.  I was unable to say a

25    word for an hour.  My chin froze.  I was unable to utter a single word.


Page 151

 1            There were some foreign journalists there in the barracks.  I

 2    spoke to them.  Perhaps that had some impact on the development.  But at

 3    any rate, they told me that the colonel would arrive for the negotiations,

 4    because before that, he had told us that he would not be arriving because

 5    there weren't enough people for him to actually conduct any negotiations.

 6            So the Colonel arrived, perhaps an hour later.  In the meantime,

 7    the others came, the President of the Rudo municipality, Mr. Topalovic,

 8    and the SDA president for Rudo, Ramiz Abdem [phoen].  I was already there,

 9    and the colonel arrived.

10       Q.   Before we get to that meeting, you described people being in the

11    barracks and meeting some reporters.  What barracks are you referring to?

12       A.   I'm referring to the Uzamnica barracks, which is quite close to

13    the dam.

14       Q.   And can you describe who you saw in the -- who were the people you

15    were referring to when you saw there were people in the barracks?

16       A.   These were the refugees from the town mostly and from the villages

17    in the immediate vicinity of the barracks, but most of them were from the

18    town, because they were afraid of the water coming.  There was this hype

19    that the water would be released, and they also knew that the army would

20    be arriving.  They took shelter in the barracks.

21       Q.   And what was their ethnicity?

22       A.   They were mostly Muslims.  Perhaps 99.9 per cent of them were

23    Muslims.  I saw some that I recognised, but there were also some Serbs

24    there.

25       Q.   And the reporter that you met, did you describe to this reporter


Page 152

 1    what you had just seen earlier regarding the map?

 2       A.   Yes.  I, in fact, asked the reporters to stay there until the next

 3    day, explaining to them, saying to them that a genocide would take place

 4    in the vicinity of the town of Visegrad.  He did not really trust me

 5    because he thought that I was one of the refugees there.  When I explained

 6    to him that I was not a refugee, that I was there to take part in the

 7    negotiations with the colonel, that he was from the outside, and I also

 8    explained to him the functions that I held at the time, then they said,

 9    "All right, we'll stay there until the next day."

10            I think that actually this was the crucial element that made the

11    colonel arrive and take part in the negotiations.

12       Q.   I'd asked you to describe what happened during those

13    negotiations.

14       A.   You mean the reporters?  We did not get into any details.

15       Q.   I'm sorry.  The negotiations with the colonel.  Would you please

16    describe the meeting with the colonel now.

17       A.   The colonel arrived.  I already mentioned other people present.

18    He is a pleasant person.  He was in a good mood.  He sat down at the

19    table.  He greeted us.  And first he addressed me saying, "Do you have any

20    particular problems?" referring to the situation that I had been in an

21    hour ago and the fact that my family was there with all the other people

22    in Brstanica.  I said that I did not have any particular problems, that I

23    had the same problems like everybody else.

24            The president of the Rudo municipality was the first to speak at

25    the meeting as the Democratic Action Party and the Serbian Democratic


Page 153

 1    Party were able to reach an agreement and that there were no problems

 2    there and that the same type of agreement should be reached in Visegrad.

 3            I then spoke very briefly, insisting on the following point:  that

 4    the JNA should protect this large group of people in Brstanica, that they

 5    should protect them so that they do not come to any harm.  They were

 6    saying that there were no problems, there was nobody to protect them from,

 7    that they were sure that there would be no problems, but I knew that there

 8    could be a large-scale massacre there.

 9       Q.   Up until this time, had the Yugoslav People's Army provided

10    protection for any of the Muslim communities in the Visegrad

11    municipality?

12       A.   You mean in just the short term or in the period of, let's say, 20

13    years?

14       Q.   No.  I'm saying at the time that you're making this request.  Was

15    it because at present there was no protection for the Muslim settlements

16    in Visegrad?

17       A.   Yes.  This was the reason I sought the protection of the Yugoslav

18    People's Army, because there was nobody else to provide such protection.

19    They were the only ones.

20       Q.   And what did Colonel Ojdanic say when you made this request?

21       A.   Colonel Ojdanic first said -- because I asked for the protection

22    of these people by the JNA, he said, "I don't know.  I have my superiors

23    too."  Then after some further conversation, I asked him, "Does it mean

24    that if we cannot have -- make sure that the SDS members are here at the

25    negotiating table, does this mean that the Yugoslav People's Army will


Page 154

 1    just sit back and watch the Muslim population being massacred?"  And his

 2    response to this was, "All right.  Tomorrow we will enter the town and we

 3    will protect this group of people," that I had mentioned, the people in

 4    Brstanica.

 5       Q.   Is there anything else that occurred at that meeting of

 6    importance?

 7       A.   Well, that was more or less it.

 8       Q.   After the meeting, I'd ask you to describe for the Chamber what

 9    happened regarding the protection that you had requested.

10       A.   After the meeting, the colonel had to go urgently to Uzice.  I

11    went out and talked for a while with Captain Vukosavljevic.  He was the

12    commander of the dam.  I told him what had happened, and he was already

13    concerned about the developments.  He was not present at the meeting, so I

14    described very briefly what had happened, and I told him that the colonel

15    promised that he would order the army to protect the population and to

16    secure or, in other words, to take the town.

17            So we said good-bye, and I went to this place where my parents

18    lived, which is called Crnca.  I spent the night there, and the next

19    morning I phoned Captain Vukosavljevic at the dam, asking him what had

20    happened with the promise that the colonel made last night about

21    protecting the civilians, and he told me that there were some unforeseen

22    problems and that the army was unable to do it that day, that they would

23    do it the next day.

24       Q.   When you went to this village, did you see any signs that there

25    was protection from the Yugoslav People's Army there?


Page 155

 1       A.   On that day?  Is that what you mean?

 2       Q.   On the day of the meeting when you went to this village, did you

 3    see any evidence that protection was being provided to these people?

 4       A.   No.  No.  Nobody from the Yugoslav People's Army was there.

 5    People were very scared.  Their fate was uncertain, and they were really

 6    afraid.

 7       Q.   Did Vukosavljevic ever suggest to you that you contact Colonel

 8    Ojdanic again?

 9       A.   Yes.

10       Q.   When was that?

11       A.   This happened on the day when the army was supposed to protect the

12    civilians, according to his promise.  Since the colonel notified us from

13    Uzice that he would be unable to do this -- to do that on that day but the

14    next day, I decided, although it was quite risky, to go there.

15            I got into my car and rushed there.  I met with Vukosavljevic and

16    I asked him, "How come the army is not moving yet?"  He said, "I don't

17    know what's happening.  Why don't you call Uzice?  Call the colonel and

18    insist that he fulfil his promise, the promise that he made the day

19    before."  And this is precisely what I did.  He gave me the phone number.

20    He also handed me the phone.  So I called him.

21            One of his officers answered the phone.  I told him who I was, and

22    I got the colonel on the line.  I reminded him of the events, and I

23    insisted for the army to go there on that day, that we were should not be

24    waiting another day.  And then he said, "Okay.  Let Captain Vukosavljevic

25    call me."  And that's what I told him.  He went to another office and


Page 156

 1    called the colonel from there.  I don't know what they were talking

 2    about.  The conversation was not long.  And he came back in a very good

 3    mood, and he told me, he said, "We got the approval from the colonel.

 4    We're going to move quickly.  Let's get all those people from the villages

 5    and into the town."

 6            He put maybe 30 soldiers onto two trucks, and I got into his car

 7    with him.  He drove a Lada Niva.  So followed by two trucks, we went

 8    straight to Brstanica to let those people know that they should go to town

 9    and take shelter in the town as soon as possible, where they would be put

10    under the control of the Yugoslav People's Army.  And that's what

11    happened.

12            We went there.  The people had already got the news somehow - they

13    knew that we would get there - and they gathered in the centre of the

14    village of Brstanica in large numbers.  Vukosavljevic insisted that this

15    all be done very quickly, that columns be formed.  There were some

16    passenger vehicles.  He wanted the old people to get into cars, and he

17    wanted everybody to go to Visegrad immediately.

18            That's what we ask.  We organised everything as quickly as

19    possible, formed the columns, and we headed towards the town.

20       Q.   Now, is this on the date that the Uzice Corps actually enters the

21    town of Visegrad?

22       A.   Yes.  That was on the same day.

23       Q.   Can you describe their arrival, where they came from, and the

24    circumstances of it?

25       A.   Well, the Uzice Corps came from the direction of Uzice, and that


Page 157

 1    is on the right bank of the Drina from the direction of Serbia, the town

 2    of Uzice in Serbia; from several directions, actually.  And they were

 3    fully equipped with the weapons that the JNA usually had.  Apart from the

 4    standard so-called infantry weapons, there were tanks, guns, mortars, and

 5    so on.

 6            They had a full range of weaponry.  The units were completely

 7    equipped, and they were coming in from different directions so that they

 8    covered the whole right bank of the River Drina, but they didn't enter the

 9    town straight away.  They did this only one or two days later.  So for one

10    or two days, the town was completely empty.

11            They entered town on the day that the people from Brstanica

12    arrived; a little before them, perhaps an hour or two before.  They took

13    control of the town.

14       Q.   Where did these people -- where were they made to go?

15       A.   The problem was where to put up this large number of people, and

16    Captain Vukosavljevic had no idea where to put them up.  First of all, he

17    thought we'd put them up in the hotel.  The hotel's name was the Hotel

18    Visegrad.  But when he saw there were many more people than he had

19    assumed, he said, "Let's go to the football stadium."  And that's what

20    happened.  He took the column off to the football stadium.  I stayed

21    behind because, before we came into the town, you could hear shooting.

22    The shooting was fairly intense along the road which we were to take.  So

23    the captain then said to me - and there were two other men with me who

24    were sitting in his car, in the Niva car - "You stay here, I'll go on

25    ahead to see what's happening, what all the shooting is about."  And he


Page 158

 1    went off in the direction the shooting was coming from, and we stayed on

 2    further down alone.  In the meantime, the people had already arrived, went

 3    into the town and went off towards the stadium, so that I arrived at the

 4    stadium when all the people were already there.

 5       Q.   Approximately how many people were assembled in the stadium?

 6       A.   At the stadium, there were about four thousand, perhaps four and a

 7    half thousand people.

 8       Q.   And did somebody from the Yugoslav People's Army address these

 9    4.000 people?

10       A.   Yes.

11       Q.   And what was the name of that person?

12       A.   The people were addressed by -- he introduced himself as the

13    commander of the locality, Lieutenant-Colonel Jovanovic.  He used a

14    loudspeaker, a megaphone.

15       Q.   Was that the first time you had seen Jovanovic?

16       A.   Yes.  That's when I saw him first.

17       Q.   Prior to his speech, did you go and try to speak with him?

18       A.   Yes.  Captain Vukosavljevic, who went with us - in fact,

19    introduced me to Jovanovic - he said, "This man's name is such and such.

20    This is his post."  And then the other one said, "I'm Lieutenant-Colonel

21    Jovanovic, the commander of the locality."  But he was a little arrogant.

22    He didn't take me seriously, and he said, "You move away and let me hear

23    from two or three of the citizens from amongst the people.  Go and call

24    two or three of the people."  And that's what I did.

25       Q.   And were you present during his address to the people?


Page 159

 1       A.   Yes.  I was a little further off, 10 to 15 metres away from him.

 2       Q.   And as best as you can remember, would you please relate to the

 3    Court what it was he said to these 4.000 Muslims assembled in the football

 4    stadium.

 5       A.   Well, I remember what he said.  He said the following.  Actually,

 6    he started off by introducing himself.  He said who he was.  He said he

 7    was the commander of the place and that they were to listen carefully to

 8    what he was going to say.  And what he said was the following:  He said

 9    that in a village -- that if a single shot was fired in any of the

10    villages, he would raze the house to the ground, and if a soldier were

11    wounded or shot in any of the villages, he would raze the whole village to

12    the ground.

13            He also said that he had the units of the White Eagles under his

14    command, the Beli Orlovi.  Otherwise those were the units that were most

15    feared by the Muslims.  They were terribly afraid of them.  And that if

16    anybody had any weapons, that they should turn them in; if they had not

17    got these weapons with them, they could bring them in tomorrow; and that

18    they were free to leave, go back to their houses.  But he also said where

19    they were allowed to go and where not.  So he enumerated all the places

20    where they could go and those that they could not go to, and he said that

21    where -- the areas his units covered, "You can go there," whereas he

22    didn't offer any guarantees for any of the other places, if people went to

23    any of the other places.  So that was more or less the gist of what he

24    said.

25       Q.   Because it's so important, I would ask you, to the best that


Page 160

 1    you're able, tell us exactly what he said regarding the White Eagles.

 2       A.   Well, he just addressed one or two sentences.  He said that the

 3    units of the White Eagles were under his command, or "are under my

 4    command."  That's what he said.  "And so take care of what you do."

 5       Q.   And what places specifically did he say Muslims were permitted to

 6    go and what places were they not permitted to go, if you remember?

 7       A.   I remember that too, because I knew all these localities.  They

 8    were -- I was well-acquainted with them.  On the right bank of the river,

 9    he said that we were permitted to go up to the village of Musici but not

10    further on, including the village of Musici.  So that village was sort of

11    -- it was better not to go to the village of Musici, but up to that

12    village, downstream from the town.  And on the left bank, he enumerated

13    all the villages in order, Sumchaila [phoen], Jelasci, Hamzici, Brstanica,

14    and said that we were permitted to go there, the people were allowed to go

15    back to those villages.

16            So what happened was that the people from the right bank, from the

17    places that the colonel did not enumerate, went to the left bank, returned

18    to the left bank, stayed with relatives or friends.

19       Q.   And these locations on the right bank, were some of these the same

20    locations that you had heard referred to as having been cleaned the day

21    before in Uzamnica Barracks -- or, I'm sorry, in the meeting the day

22    before?

23       A.   Yes, that's right.  It was precisely those places.

24       Q.   And the people were not permitted to return there?

25       A.   That's right.


Page 161

 1       Q.   Did there come a time when the 4.000 people in the stadium were

 2    searched?

 3       A.   When the colonel finished speaking, he explained that the people

 4    had to pass by in columns, and the soldiers did -- made three or four

 5    checkpoints, set up three or four checkpoints.  The people would pass by

 6    them.  They would ask if anybody had any weapons it turn in, and once the

 7    people had passed the checkpoint, they were free to go to the localities

 8    that the colonel had said were safe.  And that's what happened.

 9       Q.   And was every person in the stadium searched?

10       A.   At the beginning, they were diligent in their searches.  But as

11    there were so many people who were hurrying, it was just a routine sort of

12    quick search, not in any great detail as had been the case at first.  For

13    example, they didn't search me.

14       Q.   Did you have a gun with you at that time?

15       A.   At that time, I really did have a pistol on me.

16       Q.   And what did you do --

17       A.   It was a Zastava pistol, 762 calibre.

18       Q.   What did you do with that pistol?

19       A.   Well, as the town was full of soldiers, it was like when you come

20    out of the cinema, when the audience leaves a cinema.  I was frightened of

21    what I would do if somebody found the pistol on me.  I found Captain

22    Vukosavljevic and I handed him the pistol, telling him to keep it for me

23    because if I was searched and found with a pistol on me, it would mean my

24    head.  He took the pistol and a few days later sent me a certificate.  He

25    issued a certificate saying I had handed him the pistol.


Page 162

 1       Q.   Just for the record, what was the ethnic background of

 2    Vukosavljevic?

 3       A.   He was of Serb ethnicity.

 4       Q.   What did you do after the meeting?

 5       A.   After the meeting, the colonel spoke to me briefly and told me to

 6    report to him at the hotel.  And that's what I did.  I went to the

 7    Visegrad Hotel which was in the centre of town.

 8       Q.   Which colonel was this?

 9       A.   Colonel Jovanovic.  Actually he was Lieutenant-Colonel, I'm

10    sorry.  Not Colonel; Lieutenant-Colonel.

11       Q.   Approximately what time was this when you went to the Visegrad

12    Hotel?

13       A.   Not long after the speech delivered by commander Jovanovic.  I

14    stayed on for a few moments to see if my family was there and then went

15    off to the hotel.  When I got to the hotel, I was told to wait by an

16    officer who met me there.  He said that the commander would not be

17    receiving me straight away, that I had to wait a while.  And while I was

18    waiting by the reception desk, Mrs. Biljana Plavsic turned up along with

19    Branimir Savovic, who was wearing a military camouflage uniform.  As they

20    went in to where I was supposed to go to see the commander, I was told

21    shortly that the commander would be unable to receive me on that day and

22    that I was to return the next day.  So I left the hotel and went to the

23    place where my family was.

24       Q.   Would you please remind us who Mr. Savovic is?

25       A.   Branimir Savovic was in fact the President of the SDS, the Serbian


Page 163

 1    Democratic Party, for the Visegrad municipality.

 2       Q.   Did there come a time when you left Visegrad?

 3       A.   I left Visegrad on the 16th of May at 12.00 noon.

 4       Q.   Would you please describe for the Court the circumstances under

 5    which you left Visegrad?

 6       A.   As the army had taken control of the town, and they were to leave

 7    Visegrad on the 20th of May, I think, it was not very safe towards the end

 8    of the time for their departure.  It was unsafe.  And I felt that it was

 9    not safe for me or my family to stay, and we decided to leave town.  But

10    that was no easy thing to do, because at all the exits there were

11    checkpoints and people were not allowed to leave.  What I did was to ask

12    the Vice-President of the Serbian Democratic Party, one of the

13    vice-presidents, his name was Stanko Pecikoza, who was an influential man

14    both in the party and in town generally, to take me and my family out of

15    town, towards Uzice.  That was the only exit road open, taking you out of

16    town.  He explained to us in great detail when we -- where we should

17    gather, when the departure would be scheduled, and he took us through the

18    checkpoints.  There were two checkpoints, one in Dobrun and the other in

19    Dabric on the road to Uzice.  Then he issued instructions as to what we

20    were to do once we crossed into Serbia, how we were to proceed.  And we

21    carried on towards Macedonia.

22       Q.   And this man who helped sneak you out of Visegrad, what was his

23    ethnicity?

24       A.   He was a Serb, an influential Serb in town.

25       Q.   And do you know where he is today?


Page 164

 1       A.   Unfortunately, he died.  He is dead.  He was a good man.  And as

 2    far as I know, he was liquidated by the members of the SDS a little after

 3    the time he took me and my family out of the town.

 4            MR. GROOME:  Thank you.

 5            I have no further questions, Your Honour.

 6            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Domazet?

 7                          Cross-examined by Mr. Domazet:

 8       Q.   [Interpretation] Sir, you began your testimony by saying that the

 9    parties were formed in Visegrad.  And you mentioned, if I understood you

10    correctly, that the two strongest parties were the Party of Democratic

11    Action and the SDS party.  Is that correct?

12       A.   Yes.

13       Q.   Can you tell us which of these two parties was formed first,

14    established first?

15       A.   I don't know exactly.  I can't say for sure.  I don't have that

16    information.  But both parties were set up in a short space of time.

17       Q.   You're not sure that -- whether the SDS was formed before the SDS

18    [as interpreted]?

19       A.   Well, I'm not sure.

20       Q.   Was there any other national party, ethnic party, in the area?

21       A.   Well, if you can call them nationalist parties, there were other

22    parties where the members were predominantly one ethnic group.

23       Q.   Can we say, for example, that in the SDA party, of which you were

24    a member, there were Serbs too?

25       A.   No, there weren't.


Page 165

 1       Q.   Or that there were Muslims in the SDS?

 2       A.   No.  There weren't any Muslims in the SDS either.

 3       Q.   These, then, were nationalist parties, were they not?  Ethnically

 4    based; is that not correct?

 5       A.   Well, if you say so, then all right, yes.

 6       Q.   Well, that would emanate from your answer.  However --

 7            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Domazet, just one moment.  When both of you are

 8    speaking the same language, you present terrible problems for the

 9    interpreters.  Please pause after the answer before you start your

10    question.

11            And, sir, would you please pause before you start your answer

12    after the end of the question?  Otherwise, the interpreters lose you.

13            MR. DOMAZET:  Yes, thank you, Your Honour.

14       Q.   [Interpretation] Before the multi-party elections in

15    Bosnia-Herzegovina, in the town of Visegrad itself, in view of the ethnic

16    composition of the population, could you tell me whether it is true that

17    in posts of leadership, in executive power, the courts and legislation,

18    you had representatives of both the two major ethnic groups; that is to

19    say, the Muslims and the Serbs?

20       A.   Yes, yes.  After the multi-party elections --

21       Q.   No.  I asked before, before the multi-party elections, up until

22    the multi-party elections.

23       A.   My answer is yes.  Before as well, yes.

24       Q.   You told us that the multi-party elections, as far as Visegrad is

25    concerned, ended -- resulted in a majority for the Democratic Action


Page 166

 1    Party, with 27 seats compared to 13 seats from the SDS.  Did this

 2    correspond to the national structure of the population and the ratio

 3    between the Muslims and Serbs in town?  Roughly.

 4       A.   Roughly it did.  The ratio was roughly the same, like the national

 5    composition.

 6       Q.   After the establishment of local power and authority, after the

 7    elections that you mentioned, were there any changes in the leadership

 8    structure and leadership posts in the Visegrad area?

 9       A.   Yes.  Changes did take place in the municipal organs of

10    authority.  In the other structures there were no changes.  For example,

11    in the companies, the directors or managers weren't replaced.  If you were

12    a manager before the elections, you went on being the manager after the

13    elections.  All that changed was the structure I mentioned in the

14    municipality, the executive council, board of the municipality, and the

15    secretariats, the organs of power and authority.

16       Q.   Yes, the organs of power and authority.  Was it under the

17    competence of these authorities to replace managers of companies,

18    according to the laws that were in force at the time?

19       A.   Well, I can't be a hundred per cent certain, but I think that the

20    authorities could have replaced them had they wanted to.

21       Q.   If I understand you correctly, the president of the municipality

22    could replace a manager of a company in Visegrad; is that right?  Is that

23    what you're saying?

24       A.   No, he couldn't do that directly.  He couldn't issue a direct

25    order to have these people replaced, but the Assembly did have authority


Page 167

 1    over the nomination and appointment of certain directors or managers of

 2    companies.

 3       Q.   Do you mean the directors of the communal enterprises, the

 4    utilities, or the other socially-owned companies as they were called at

 5    the time?

 6       A.   Well, quite simply, to quote an example, they could exert changes

 7    on the utilities companies and the companies close to the state

 8    structures, attached to the state structure, but they could also replace

 9    other managers as well.  I know, for example, because I was one of the

10    managers.  I was a manager myself, a director.  I know that they talked to

11    my colleagues, and people were fairly afraid as to whether the new

12    authorities would replace the directors or not.  I remember that.  We

13    were -- all had this qualm.

14       Q.   Yes.  You were the director of one particular company.  I won't

15    mention which one, but it wasn't an utilities company.  It was a

16    socially-owned company.  And you were not appointed by either the

17    municipal assembly, nor could it relieve you of your duties nor appoint

18    you to another post; is that correct?

19       A.   Yes, that's correct.

20       Q.   Can you tell us whether after the establishment of these new

21    authorities after the first multi-party elections, at any post of

22    leadership in the courts such as the president of the court, the president

23    of the municipality or executive board, were they Serbs or were all these

24    posts held by Muslims, in fact?

25       A.   Well, this corresponded roughly -- that is to say, I know when


Page 168

 1    negotiations took place with respect to the nomination and appointment of

 2    people to fill these responsible posts.  I know that a basic criterion for

 3    this was the number of votes gained at the elections, and that's how those

 4    structures were established, the new authorities after the elections.

 5       Q.   My question was a concrete one.  The president of the municipality

 6    was a Muslim, was he not?

 7       A.   Yes.

 8       Q.   The president of the executive board likewise?

 9       A.   Well, I can tell you who everybody was.  Yes, the president was a

10    Muslim.  Yes.

11       Q.   This was a prominent leadership post after the president of the

12    municipality.  What about the president of the court in Visegrad after the

13    elections?  Who was he?  Was he a Muslim?

14       A.   I'm not quite sure, but I think he was, yes.  That is to say --

15       Q.   Well, these are facts that we can ascertain.  But you said that

16    this corresponded to the structure.  How did this correspond if all the

17    leadership posts were held by Muslims?  How then do you believe that the

18    Serbs had a share in the posts of leadership, according to the election

19    results?

20       A.   Well, this is how it was.  The president of the municipality, as

21    the highest authority, came from the ranks of the SDA party.  The

22    vice-president was from the ranks of the SDS party, and her name was

23    Jelisavka.  I can't remember the lady's surname, but she used to be a

24    teacher at the primary school I attended.  Now, the president of the

25    executive board was an SDA member, and the vice-president was from the


Page 169

 1    SDA, and he was Slobodan Klipe.

 2            So this is how the parity ratio worked, power distribution.  For

 3    example, the president of one of the municipal bodies, I think the

 4    registry office, land registry office, was a Serb also.  His name was

 5    Sinisa Ceho, I think.  And that's why I say more or less why this parity

 6    was reflected on the posts of leadership.  The election results were

 7    reflected on the composition of the leadership posts.

 8       Q.   If I understand you correctly, the only Serb whom you considered

 9    to have been in a prime post was the president of the land registry

10    office.  Is that true?  If so, let me tell you that that post did not

11    exist.  Perhaps he was head of the land registry office so that that was

12    the only post that a Serb held, just that post with the land registry

13    office, whereas in all the other posts Serbs were either assistants or

14    deputies.

15       A.   Well, yes.  I have remembered what I have just told you.  That's

16    what I recall.  But I continue to claim and I know that it was agreed upon

17    that the SDA party and the Serbian Democratic Party -- and as I say, I

18    attended some of those meetings when they were deciding on the

19    distribution of power and authority on the basis of the electoral

20    results.  That's how it worked.  That's how the system functioned.  An

21    agreement did exist.  It was signed and everybody was happy.

22       Q.   On the basis of what do you consider that the SDS was happy, was

23    pleased, satisfied?

24       A.   Well, they accepted the agreement that was reached.  The agreement

25    was accepted by both parties and signed, and they put forward these


Page 170

 1    people.  For example, for the vice-president of the municipality and the

 2    vice-president of the executive board and so on and so forth, they

 3    nominated people from amongst their ranks, and that is why I say that I

 4    consider that they accepted it.

 5       Q.   Up until this authority was established, did the statute of your

 6    municipality envisage a two-thirds majority deciding upon all major issues

 7    according to the statute?

 8       A.   Well, I can't be quite sure of that.  I can't say with any

 9    certainty, but yes, certainly some questions must have been decided, and

10    to be decided by a two-third majority vote.

11            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Domazet, it's 1.00, lunch.  But when we resume,

12    do you think we might advance to the relevant period, which was in 1992?

13    What is the relevance of all this?  Was it to provide some sort of motive

14    for the Serbs to throw out the Muslims?  What is its relevance?

15            MR. DOMAZET: [Interpretation] No, Your Honour.  I don't mean to

16    justify anyone or anything, any act.  But I considered, and I am drawing

17    to a close.  I'm reaching the end.  I just have a few more questions on

18    that area and then we'll go back to April 1992 and continue from there.

19            JUDGE HUNT: It better be relevant, though, Mr. Domazet.  We are

20    not going to run into a political argument about what was fair and what

21    was not fair back in 1990.  That has nothing to do with this case.

22            So if you can say you will have two questions, we'll allow you two

23    questions, but we want to get on with what is relevant, which, as you

24    agree, is April 1992.

25            We will resume --


Page 171

 1            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, if I may just before we do break.

 2            JUDGE HUNT:  Yes.

 3            MR. GROOME:  Over the weekend a situation arose regarding two

 4    witnesses, and I will be seeking some protective measures for those two

 5    witnesses.  One of them is scheduled to testify tomorrow.  I wonder if the

 6    Court would entertain an oral application followed by papers or grant me

 7    time to try to put together the affidavit and the motion this afternoon.

 8            JUDGE HUNT:  There is no need to put it in writing, Mr. Groome,

 9    but we do want some reason why this is being done late, and in particular,

10    if you want something more than facial pixilation and pseudonym, you will

11    have to justify it with something fairly substantial.

12            MR. GROOME:  There's nothing more than that, Your Honour, and

13    there is an explanation why it is late.

14            JUDGE HUNT:  Very well.  We will resume at 2.30.

15                          --- Luncheon recess taken at 1.04 p.m.

16                          --- On resuming at 2.30 p.m.

17            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Groome, on my desk when I got back was a motion

18    seeking leave to call an additional expert witness.  May I suggest that

19    this appalling American habit of putting everything in writing, which has

20    been imposed upon this Tribunal, is not one that we need follow in every

21    case?  What I suggest you do is you speak to Mr. Domazet about it, give

22    him a copy of the report.  If he's got some problems with it, then we'll

23    hear it when we are about to finish at 4.00 one afternoon or something

24    like that.  But we do not need this sort of motion in writing.  I don't

25    know why we were ever inflicted with it, but I rather suspect that


Page 172

 1    Judge McDonald had something to do with it.

 2            MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.

 3            JUDGE HUNT:  Right.  You proceed, Mr. Domazet.

 4            MR. DOMAZET:  [Interpretation] Thank you, Your Honour.

 5       Q.   I would like to conclude, and as I have already said, I have

 6    perhaps two more questions relating to the period.  First question:  Are

 7    you aware of the fact that the Assembly that you spoke about changed its

 8    statute and repelled the provision about the two-thirds majority required

 9    for certain decisions, that this was done precisely by the Muslim majority

10    in the Assembly, that this decision was -- that this provision was

11    changed?

12       A.   I'm not aware of this.  I don't think that this was done.

13       Q.   Another thing:  Are you aware of the fact that the Serb deputies

14    left the Assembly and no longer took part in its work?

15       A.   Well, this might have happened sporadically when they were unhappy

16    with certain items or provisions.  Some deputies may have left the

17    Assembly, but then they would come again and take part in the next

18    session.

19       Q.   Well, we obviously are not talking about the same thing.  But I

20    don't want to dwell upon it any longer.  I would now like to go to the

21    period spring 1992, that you spoke about at length and in some detail

22    today.

23            One of the questions put to you referred to the Territorial

24    Defence and the fact that weapons were seized -- weapons were seized from

25    the Territorial Defence.  Was the Territorial Defence in Visegrad composed


Page 173

 1    only of -- both of Serbs and of Muslims or just some of those?

 2       A.   The Territorial Defence was composed both of Serbs and Muslims.

 3       Q.   Does that mean that if the weapons were seized from the

 4    Territorial Defence in Visegrad, that all the members of the Territorial

 5    Defence no longer had access to weapons, regardless of their ethnicity,

 6    Muslim or Serb?

 7       A.   Yes.

 8       Q.   Thank you.  You also spoke about the fact that Serbs were able to

 9    obtain weapons in some way.  Do you have any specific knowledge as to who

10    obtained the weapons and in which way, based on your direct knowledge or

11    direct observation?

12       A.   I personally did not see weapons being distributed to Serbs, if

13    that's what you're asking me.

14       Q.   Thank you.  Are you -- do you know that the Muslims did the same

15    thing; in other words, that they also obtained weapons in this period?

16       A.   At that time, some Muslims did obtain weapons by actually buying

17    those weapons.

18       Q.   At that time, was the chief of the MUP or the police, was it Seval

19    Murtic, a Muslim?

20       A.   Yes.

21       Q.   Did anyone - I mean specifically the JNA that you referred to when

22    you spoke about the Territorial Defence - did anyone interfere with the

23    weapons held by the police?  Did they disarm the police or ask them to

24    surrender their weapons?

25       A.   I cannot state this with any certainty, but I don't think so.  I


Page 174

 1    think that the answer is no.

 2       Q.   You mentioned that you have personal knowledge that Serbs were

 3    called up for military exercises because you had the opportunity to see

 4    this in your company.  Can you tell us who sent those call-up papers and

 5    who is in charge of sending such call-up papers?

 6       A.   I do not know who sent those papers.  I just heard from what

 7    people who actually went to those exercises told me.  They gave me this as

 8    an excuse as to why they have to be absent from work.

 9       Q.   Is it your knowledge or do you remember that it was the military

10    department that was in charge of sending such papers?

11       A.   In normal circumstances, yes.

12       Q.   Do you remember who was, at the time, the chief or the head of the

13    military department in Visegrad?

14       A.   At the time when the call-up papers were sent out, I do not

15    remember who was the head of the office, of the department, but I do know

16    it was a Serb.

17       Q.   Are you sure?  Do you know the name of that person?

18       A.   No, I do not know his name, but I am absolutely certain that he

19    was a Serb, because no Muslims worked there.

20       Q.   Let us stay with the military department.  Are you aware of the

21    fact that Muslims seized some weapons belonging to the military

22    department?

23       A.   No.

24       Q.   You spoke about an incident in the quarry around about the 4th of

25    April.  Could you please tell us more about it?  You said that some people


Page 175

 1    were shot at.  Do you know who opened fire and for what reason, and what

 2    was the conclusion of this incident?

 3       A.   I could only make an assumption as to who opened fire.  I knew the

 4    people who were shot at very well.  And immediately after the event, they

 5    told me about it, and the outcome of the shooting was that everybody left

 6    their posts there.

 7       Q.   Those who worked there.  Is that what you mean?

 8       A.   Yes.

 9       Q.   Today you spoke about the events a day or two after that when

10    mortar fire was opened on Visegrad; is that correct?

11       A.   Yes.

12       Q.   You also talked about the fact that the Muslim areas and the town

13    centre were targeted.  Can you please tell me which areas in Visegrad were

14    purely Muslim?  Were there any such areas, in fact, at all?

15       A.   There were quite a few areas which were purely Muslim.  There can

16    be no doubt about that.  In addition to the town centre, Nezuci was one

17    the first villages to be targeted.  It is a village quite close to the

18    dam.

19       Q.   As far as I know, the dam is quite far away from the town itself.

20       A.   Yes.

21       Q.   So you claim that mortar fire was opened both on the town centre

22    and areas around the dam?

23       A.   I was present in the town centre when the shells fell.  As for

24    this other thing, I want to say that this was not close to the dam.  The

25    village of Nezuci was targeted.  In addition to the villagers, there were


Page 176

 1    quite a few refugees there, and I was personally visited by a man who

 2    asked me for some gasoline to transport his wife to the hospital because

 3    she was wounded in the mortar attack.  This woman was 11 months' pregnant

 4    [sic] at the time.

 5            There was another person, a Muslim priest, who was also wounded,

 6    and he was also taken to Gorazde, to the hospital.

 7       Q.   When you talk about the persons who were wounded, do you know

 8    whether anyone was killed in any of these attacks in Visegrad and the

 9    surrounding areas?

10       A.   There were some people who died; specifically this woman that I

11    mentioned.  She did not survive.  I know that quite a few people were

12    wounded.  I'm not sure about the persons who were killed, as to their

13    number, but some people were killed.

14       Q.   In Visegrad itself?

15       A.   In Visegrad, yes, but to a lesser extent.  I am now talking about

16    this village of Nezuci, which is close to the dam.

17       Q.   When you spoke about the negotiations with the representatives of

18    the SDS which were mediated by the JNA, you said that the meeting took

19    place somewhere in Kosovo Polje.  Why was the meeting not held in

20    Visegrad, or in other words, where were those SDS representatives at the

21    time when you organised this meeting?

22       A.   The meeting that you're referring to was held at Kosovo Polje.  It

23    was not organised with the mediation of the army.  I spoke directly with

24    Branimir Savovic, who was the SDS president.  He was in Visegradska Banja,

25    on the phone, and we agreed to have a meeting at Kosovo Polje because it


Page 177

 1    was roughly halfway between Visegradska Banja and the town itself.

 2       Q.   Does that mean that at that time, Brane Savovic and the SDS

 3    members were in Visegradska Banja?

 4       A.   As far as I know -- maybe I could give you a wider answer.  I knew

 5    the phone numbers in Visegradska Banja very well, and Savovic answered the

 6    phone that -- the phone number that I dialed, but I think that at that

 7    time I think that he was actually in a village further up from Visegradska

 8    Banja.  That's my assumption.

 9       Q.   Do you by any chance know why Savovic and the others were not in

10    Visegrad but in Visegradska Banja or in the villages nearby?

11       A.   I think that they went, left the town of their own volition and

12    went elsewhere because they wanted to occupy the town from the positions

13    around it.

14       Q.   So you think that they left the city, the town, in order to be

15    able to go back and occupy it?

16       A.   Yes, that's my opinion.

17       Q.   Were there any Serbs in the town at the time, or did a certain

18    number or perhaps the majority or even all of them, did they leave the

19    town?

20       A.   Most of them left the town, and some remained.

21       Q.   This is the period before the incident involving the releasing of

22    the water from the dam?

23       A.   Yes.  But we met at Kosovo Polje one day after the water was

24    released.

25       Q.   Yes.  I'm just -- I just want to -- we are talking about the Serbs


Page 178

 1    leaving the town.  When did they leave the town?

 2       A.   Before that.

 3       Q.   At the time --

 4            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Domazet, the witness is behaving very well.  He's

 5    pausing.  You're not.  Just give it a break.  You've got your earphones

 6    on.

 7            MR. DOMAZET:  Yes, I understand.

 8            JUDGE HUNT:  You can probably hear it.  It's a good test, if I may

 9    say so, if you see that the typing is finished, you know then that the

10    interpretation is finished.  But please do pause.

11            MR. DOMAZET:

12       Q.   Can I then take it to mean the following:  When the threat was

13    made that the water would be released, that mostly Muslims remained in the

14    town?

15       A.   Yes, mostly, but there was a substantial number of Serbs left

16    too.

17       Q.   When you talked about the Uzamnica Barracks and the fact that many

18    people had taken refuge there and that perhaps 99 per cent of these people

19    were Muslims, were these the same people that remained in Visegrad and who

20    left Visegrad, who fled Visegrad, because of the danger that the water

21    might be released?

22       A.   Yes.

23       Q.   As regards the releasing of the water, you told us today that this

24    had been done by a man by the name of Murat Sabanovic, and you said that

25    he had got there on his own initiative, but you left it at that.  Could


Page 179

 1    you please clarify it, what did you mean when you said that, if you still

 2    maintain that he went to the hydroelectric power plant on his own

 3    initiative?

 4       A.   Yes.  I did use this term advisedly, "on his own initiative."  He

 5    took with him a group of his friends, neighbours, perhaps some of his

 6    relatives.  They organised themselves in their village, since the

 7    situation was such that they felt this overall insecurity, and the people

 8    in the villages just organised themselves in order to protect themselves

 9    and their families, their villages.  And he went with a group of his

10    relatives, neighbours and so on, to the dam, and this is what I meant when

11    I said that he did it on his own initiative.

12       Q.   So he went to the dam with a group of his relatives and

13    neighbours.  Were they armed?

14       A.   Yes, they were armed.

15       Q.   As far as you know, do you know if there was anyone on the dam to

16    defend the dam?  Do you think -- do you know whether the dam was defended

17    by anyone with weapons?

18       A.   No.  There was nobody to offer any resistance.  The dam was not

19    guarded.

20       Q.   As far as you remember, how long did it last?  How long did Murat

21    Sabanovic and his friends and relatives hold the dam?

22       A.   Well, not to be too precise, I think about four days, four or five

23    days, thereabouts.

24       Q.   During that time, did the police in Visegrad take any measures to

25    resolve this problem in any way, to arrest Murat Sabanovic and the rest of


Page 180

 1    the people who had taken the dam?

 2       A.   I do not know exactly, because these events were happening very

 3    fast.  A lot of things happened every day.  I don't know whether they did

 4    anything, but I do know that there was no danger, that he and his group

 5    were no danger to the personnel at the dam or anyone else.

 6       Q.   Can you be more specific?  How do you know that he posed no danger

 7    to the personnel at the dam, if we know that he was armed and that they

 8    held -- that they were armed and that they held the dam?

 9       A.   I do not have any specific proof.  But on the basis of the actual

10    situation, he did not make any threats to anyone, any of the employees on

11    the dam, and since the people who worked -- also, the people who worked on

12    the dam said the same thing.

13       Q.   This is what you heard from the people who worked on the dam, if I

14    understand you correctly?

15       A.   Yes.

16       Q.   Yet if the fact that he held the dam with the weapons, if this was

17    not a great risk, do you also maintain that the threat of releasing the

18    water was no -- that it was not a great threat, neither for Visegrad nor

19    for other places down river from Visegrad on the Drina River?

20       A.   I do not make any such claims because I'm not an expert.  But as

21    far as I know, since I am of the same profession, I was able to conclude

22    that no major damage could have been caused, particularly in light of the

23    fact that the next dam further down river was empty and that it was

24    possible for this dam to hold the water from the previous dam.

25       Q.   Yes.  But do you know -- are you not familiar with the fact that


Page 181

 1    this river, that this lake, was emptied at the time precisely because

 2    there was a danger that Murat Sabanovic might release the water from the

 3    previous dam?

 4       A.   Yes.  I think this was the reason why this was done.

 5       Q.   Can you tell us something more about the incident when 12

 6    uniformed police officers of Serb ethnic background were arrested?  You

 7    said that perhaps half of them were in the police.  You said up until ten

 8    days before the event.  Am I correct in my memory?

 9       A.   Yes, yes.  Something like that, I think.

10       Q.   Can you please explain what happened in the ten-day period before

11    this event?  Did they cease being members of the police or did something

12    else happen?

13       A.   Well, I think that it was perhaps 10 or 15 days before.  I cannot

14    be much more specific.  The SDS asked for the police force to be split

15    up.  I attended some of the meetings where they demanded that the police

16    be split up into the Serbian force and the Muslim force.  And since they

17    had a lot of influence over the Serbs, ethnic Serbs, some ten days before

18    the shooting they directly were in charge of most of the Serb police

19    officers, which means that most of them were already under the command of

20    the SDS.

21       Q.   If possible, could you explain this to us in a little more

22    detail?  How was it possible for one portion of the police force to be

23    separate in one and the same town and have a separate command structure,

24    if I understood you correctly?  Could you explain that to us?

25       A.   In concrete terms, the demands that were made was that there be


Page 182

 1    two police forces with two headquarters and for this newly established

 2    police force that they wanted to establish - that is, they envisaged -

 3    they had set aside a building next to the new bridge, on the right bank,

 4    about a kilometre away from the centre of town.  That building that was to

 5    become the headquarters belonged to a company which was in charge of

 6    roads.  It was the road administration company.  And I know that they

 7    wanted this to become their police station.  And that's why I said a

 8    moment ago what I said.

 9       Q.   But this did not actually come about; is that right?  It didn't

10    happen?

11       A.   There was no political agreement for this to be implemented nor

12    was there agreement from the competent authorities.  I think that the main

13    police administration was in Sarajevo, and they did not give the go-ahead

14    for that.  No such agreement was reached.  But nevertheless, they did so

15    on their own initiative.  But they didn't have their command headquarters

16    in that particular building, the one they had asked for during the

17    negotiations.

18       Q.   However, if I understood you correctly, among the group of people

19    arrested, a certain number, almost half of them, were active-duty

20    policemen, is that right, or Serbs?  They were Serbs; is that right?

21       A.   Yes.

22       Q.   Were they arrested because they were with another group of Serbs

23    or were no longer policemen, or was there another reason, if you happen to

24    know what the reason was, because you did speak about the reasons earlier

25    on?


Page 183

 1       A.   As far as I know, they no longer went to work regularly.  They no

 2    longer went to the police station regularly to take up their duties

 3    there.  And as they were in the company of people who were armed and wore

 4    uniforms but did not belong to any regular organisation, I think that that

 5    was the reason they were arrested.

 6       Q.   When they were arrested, I assume that they were taken to the

 7    police station.  Were they all detained - that is to say, the policemen

 8    and the rest who were not policemen - and what happened to them?

 9       A.   Yes, they were all detained.  I know that for sure.  And then

10    after five or six days -- five, six, or seven days later - I'm not quite

11    sure of the time - they were handed over to the Yugoslav People's Army at

12    the dam; that is to say, they were released.

13       Q.   Six to seven days after they were arrested; is that what you

14    mean?

15       A.   Yes, thereabouts.

16       Q.   Did they spend all that time at the police station or at the dam

17    or both at the police station and on the dam?

18       A.   Well, I wasn't as well acquainted with those affairs.  I know that

19    they were at the police station.  But as that area was shelled, then

20    people didn't stay there for any length of time or move around, and I

21    think that that was the reason they were transferred to the left bank as

22    prisoners, to accompany their company building, and then sent from there

23    to the dam.  That's what I seem to recollect.

24       Q.   But the police force didn't change its headquarters from the

25    locality that you said was in danger of being shelled.  The police force


Page 184

 1    stayed on; is that right?

 2       A.   Yes.  I think the police force stayed on there, that locality, at

 3    the police station.

 4       Q.   The group on the dam was released, and it spent the last days on

 5    the dam.  But the dam was held by Murat Sabanovic.  Now, how can you

 6    explain the fact that they came under his command and control, that is to

 7    say that they become his prisoners if they were arrested by the regular

 8    police force?  How did they come to be under his control?

 9       A.   I didn't say that during those last days; that is to say, during

10    the last two days, I communicated with those people, and I know about

11    that.  On the last day or perhaps the last two days, they were put up at

12    the Granit construction company, and nearby there was a restaurant, and

13    that's where they were.  I know that full well because I was there.  And

14    one of the prisoners from that place talked on the telephone with Branimir

15    Savovic.  I know that for sure.  As for the rest, I didn't see it myself.

16       Q.   At that time, you were conducting negotiations and you were

17    probably well acquainted with the overall situation, were you not?  Now, I

18    asked you how it could have come about that on the last few days or the

19    very last day they came to be in the hands of ^ Murat Sabanovic and his

20    group, the group that held the dam.  How did that come about?

21       A.   I don't know that they were ever in his hands, as you have just

22    said.  What I know is what I have told you.  I know that when people left

23    the town, when the water was released and when the army was coming in,

24    they were taken in a vehicle in the direction of Gorazde, towards Gorazde,

25    because that's where the population withdrew to.  Everybody went up there,


Page 185

 1    to Gorazde.  They were withdrawing towards Gorazde.

 2       Q.   Did you give the Prosecution a tape on which, among others, you

 3    had conversations taped of these people, these people who were arrested or

 4    detained, a tape where they spoke about-- speak about those days and the

 5    conditions prevailing, the conditions under which they were taken into

 6    custody?

 7       A.   I remember handing over a videotape to the investigator.  Is that

 8    the term, the right term?  I don't know.  But I don't remember the

 9    details.

10            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Domazet, let's get this very clear.  The

11    investigators are not part of -- they're not part of the Tribunal as

12    such.  They're not our investigators.  They are the Prosecution's

13    investigators.  Now, if you want to get this tape from the Prosecution,

14    you only have to ask for it, I would have thought.  I don't know why we're

15    spending so much time with this.

16            MR. DOMAZET: [Interpretation] Your Honour, I was just asking the

17    witness whether he gave the Prosecution investigator the tape, because I

18    received the tape yesterday from the Prosecution, from the OTP, and saw on

19    the tape the conversations with these particular individuals who speak

20    about the fact that they were held in the hydroelectric power plant, that

21    they were in the water, underneath the water level, and I really did wish

22    to have an explanation as to how it was possible that Murat Sabanovic was

23    holding these people at the dam if they had been arrested by the regular

24    police force.

25            But let me leave that aside for the time being.  I won't pursue


Page 186

 1    the matter.

 2            JUDGE HUNT:  Sometime ago, the witness said - it's at page 89 at

 3    line 14 - they were handed over to the Yugoslav People's Army at the dam.

 4    Now, that's what he started with, and then you started to suggest that

 5    there was another particular person involved in it, which he has never

 6    accepted.  If you want to challenge his version of it, put to him what you

 7    say happened for him to deal with it.  But let's get on with the case.

 8            MR. DOMAZET: [Interpretation] I agree, Your Honour, and I shall

 9    proceed.  From the tape that he supplied, I came by the information that I

10    used a moment ago and talked about.

11       Q.   Now, I have several questions about the JNA, the Yugoslav People's

12    Army.  During the time you're talking about, that is to say, April 1992,

13    at that time did the JNA represent the regular army of the then

14    Yugoslavia?  Or let me put it another way:  the sole, regular Yugoslav

15    army?

16       A.   Yes.

17       Q.   Do you happen to know that the headquarters of the corps was in

18    Uzice and that Visegrad and the Uzamnica Barracks belong to that

19    particular corps?  Are you aware of that?

20       A.   No.

21       Q.   You don't know that the corps' headquarters were in Uzice or don't

22    you know that the Uzamnica Barracks belong to that corps?  I have to

23    reformulate that question because there were two there, two points.

24       A.   When I said "no," I meant about the Uzamnica Barracks, that I

25    didn't know it belonged to the corps.  I didn't know that.  It was


Page 187

 1    difficult to know in view of the fact -- of the way the army was

 2    organised, and that was -- was organised, and that the corps' headquarters

 3    was in Uzice.  As to that fact, everybody knew -- seemed to know that.

 4    And I think even now that that's where the headquarters was.

 5       Q.   Yes.  The headquarters were there, but did Visegrad belong to that

 6    corps, according to the territorial military organisation?  And your

 7    answer to that was that you didn't know.  I accept that, thank you.

 8            When you spoke today about the JNA, you used the term "occupied,"

 9    talking about Visegrad.  Can you explain why you consider that a regular

10    army, the regular army of a state, is in fact occupying part of its

11    territory, if we are talking about a regular army?  Why should you use the

12    term "occupy"?

13       A.   Well, it's like this, you see:  First of all, the JNA, the

14    Yugoslav People's Army, was no longer the JNA because all the officers

15    were Serbs and all the soldiers who came to Visegrad were also Serbs.

16    Next, the Muslim population was very much afraid of that army.  On the

17    other hand, the Serb population, the Serb villages, embraced the JNA

18    wholeheartedly, and as I said -- but as I say, it was no longer the JNA,

19    an army in which everybody believed in, which everybody believed in.  It

20    had already become a Serb army.  So those are the reasons for which I used

21    the term I used.

22       Q.   On the basis of what?  Do you maintain that this army was made up

23    of exclusively Serb officers and soldiers?  Do you have any facts and

24    figures about that, or is that merely your assumption?

25       A.   I have no written material, facts and figures, to bear this out.


Page 188

 1    But all the officers that I came into contact with - and I came into

 2    contact with about ten of them - they were all ethnic Serbs and, for the

 3    most part, originated from Serbia.  The soldiers who came with that corps

 4    were also -- and I had contact with the majority of those soldiers, and my

 5    neighbours and my brother had contacts with another -- with other

 6    soldiers, and as I say, they were all ethnic Serbs.  So there was not a

 7    single Muslim among them.

 8       Q.   Very well.  But you will agree with something you -- that is to

 9    say, you said earlier on that that was the only regular army in the

10    Yugoslavia of the day.

11       A.   Professionally, yes.  The only professional army, yes.

12       Q.   You also said that the Muslims were afraid of the JNA, that they

13    feared it.  That's what you said a moment ago.  Now, how do you explain

14    the fact that the Uzamnica Barracks was full of Muslims who had fled to

15    the barracks?  If, as you say, they were afraid of the JNA, why would they

16    have fled and taken refuge in the barracks?

17       A.   At that time, people were generally highly nervous.  There was a

18    lot of fear and panic among the population and the people wanted to take

19    shelter, to find safety somewhere.  Everybody was afraid to seek out a

20    safe place for themselves individually, so they formed groups and chose a

21    place where they thought they would be safest.  Because it was not only

22    the Uzice Corps which posed a threat - and they knew that this corps was

23    coming to Visegrad - but other ones too, the other paramilitary

24    formations.  They were afraid of them.  So there was a general fear and

25    panic amongst the population, and people were looking to see where they


Page 189

 1    could take refuge.  And there was a sort of unwritten law, according to

 2    which everybody gravitated towards the barracks because they thought,

 3    well, the army is there and it will be safer there.  But they were not

 4    only in the barracks.  They were elsewhere as well.  They sought refuge

 5    and protection, for example, in the retarded children's centre for girls

 6    or some other organisation.  And they felt safety in numbers.  They

 7    thought they would be safer if they were together.

 8       Q.   Yes, that is possible, but you will recognise that a large number

 9    of them, as you yourself say, went to the Uzamnica Barracks; whereas you

10    say they were afraid of the JNA, which was coming to Visegrad.  So this

11    remains unclear to me.  Your reasoning there is not clear.  But I don't

12    want to insist upon an answer, unless you wish to add anything.

13       A.   No, I don't wish to add anything.  I have nothing special to add.

14       Q.   Part of your testimony dwelt on an explanation and something that

15    disturbs you today; that is to say, the portion of your testimony when you

16    said you heard officers of the JNA in front of you looking at maps and

17    speaking about individual sections which, as you said, they had designated

18    as being clean or ones that should be clean.  I understood you to say that

19    you were afraid that this meant that the population from those territories

20    and these areas would either be killed or expelled or arrested.  Am I

21    right?  Is that what you said?

22       A.   Yes.

23       Q.   At that particular point in time, in view of the overall

24    situation - because, as you said, you were in constant contact with the

25    JNA officers during that time - did you have any reason to believe that


Page 190

 1    something like that was possible, that the JNA could ever do anything like

 2    that to the population of whole areas or villages around Visegrad, in the

 3    environs of Visegrad?

 4       A.   Well, at that particular point I was completely convinced that a

 5    massacre of these people was being planned, the people that I mentioned.

 6       Q.   Did a massacre of that type actually take place?  And during the

 7    entire stay of the JNA in Visegrad - and I know that they were there for

 8    over a month - did anything like that happen?  And were there any dead

 9    and, if so, how many?

10       A.   Luckily, the massacre did not take place.  And during the time the

11    JNA spent in Visegrad, a relatively -- a relatively few people lost their

12    lives after their arrival.  Perhaps seven or eight -- there were seven or

13    eight casualties.  And during the time they spent in the town and its

14    environs - once again let me say conditionally, because even one life is a

15    lot - but given the times and circumstances, I can say that relatively few

16    people died.

17       Q.   Didn't you think perhaps that the term "clean" meant that there

18    were no groups around in the area, armed individuals or any armed

19    resistance that the army could encounter?  Didn't you think that "clean"

20    might apply to that?

21       A.   No, no.  The notion, the term, and the expression "everything is

22    clean," what was meant was that too, what you just said, but also the

23    other thing, that there was nobody left.  First of all, that there were no

24    Muslims.

25       Q.   But there were Muslims in the villages and in those areas?


Page 191

 1       A.   In those parts that he pointed to, there were not.  There weren't

 2    any.

 3       Q.   Can you recollect which particular localities were mentioned and

 4    which villages?

 5       A.   The officer pointing to the map went -- did not go village by

 6    village in detail, although they are villages close to each other.  He

 7    just pointed to it as a smaller region.  He did not go village by

 8    village.  I remember when he was showing this, he would draw a circle

 9    around the whole of the right bank and say, "That unit is here."  I don't

10    know the name of the unit, but he would say, "The unit is here."  And it

11    was the usual term for army organisation.  He would refer to the units

12    stationed there, and he would say, "That is clean."  Then he would say,

13    "The other unit is over here and that is clean too."  And this covered

14    the whole right bank.  He covered the whole right bank designating the

15    areas in this way.

16       Q.   When you say this unit is there and the region is clean, you mean,

17    as I understand you, that the region comprised several villages; is that

18    right?

19       A.   Yes.  Yes, that's right.

20       Q.   Did that mean that there were no more inhabitants in those

21    villages, and are you quite certain that that is what it meant and what

22    villages were meant?

23       A.   I know which villages are in the region he pointed out.  He didn't

24    mention the name of the villages but would just draw a circle around the

25    region on the map.  But as I lived in Visegrad and as I know all these


Page 192

 1    villages and pass through practically all of them personally, I know which

 2    the villages are that are located in that particular area.  I can

 3    enumerate some of them if you want.

 4       Q.   But what I'm interested in is the following:  When you refer to

 5    the term "clean," you yourself say that you thought that this meant that

 6    the people were either killed or expelled.  They were not killed.  You

 7    said that yourself.  That they had been expelled, this would mean an

 8    enormous number of people displaced in another area or in another village

 9    quite close to Visegrad, and this would be visible.  People would have

10    seen that.  So that day when you heard this conversation or a day later,

11    you would have had to have learnt about this and realised your mistake in

12    taking the term to mean what you first thought it meant.

13       A.   Well, I knew that.  Practically all the villages on the right bank

14    of the Drina River; that is to say, the population crossed to the left

15    bank, to villages on the left bank of the river.  And I knew many of these

16    people personally.  They either worked in my own company or they were --

17    we were related in some way, kinship relations.  I had a lot of family

18    members on the right bank.  So I saw them, some people from almost every

19    village.  And they were the people who were in Brstanica, for example.  So

20    a large people were from the right bank who had moved to the left bank and

21    who then went on from the left bank to the stadium.

22       Q.   Yes.  But did they move to the left bank because of the actions of

23    the JNA or not, that is another matter.  What I understood you to say is

24    these people reached the stadium with the help of the JNA.  Is that

25    right?


Page 193

 1       A.   Yes.

 2       Q.   And they were then promised that they would go back to Visegrad

 3    and asked to go back to Visegrad and continue to work; is that right?

 4       A.   Yes.

 5       Q.   After that, did they return en masse and take up their work, and

 6    did life and work continue in Visegrad without any major incidents taking

 7    place?

 8       A.   Yes.

 9       Q.   And how long did that go on for?  According to you, how long did

10    that last?

11       A.   Until perhaps seven days before the army left Visegrad, because

12    the situation had more or less gone back to normal.  So ten or seven days

13    before.

14       Q.   You mean before or after their departure?

15       A.   Before their departure.  The situation, given the circumstances,

16    had got back to normal.  It was fairly good.  The situation was fairly

17    good seven to ten days before the army departed, but then the situation

18    started to deteriorate.

19       Q.   When you talked about the fact that the Lieutenant

20    Colonel Jovanovic told you which villages the Muslim population could go

21    back to, and you mentioned some locations both on the left and on the

22    right bank of the river, was any explanation offered for such a request to

23    the effect that these villages were under JNA control whereas some others

24    were not, or was there no -- was it not specified?

25       A.   As far as I can remember, people kept asking questions at the


Page 194

 1    stadium of the commander, Jovanovic, "Where can we go?  Where is it safe

 2    for us to go?"  And then he enumerated the locations that I had already

 3    mentioned, saying that, "This is safe.  This is under our control, whereas

 4    the rest is not under our control and is not safe."

 5       Q.   I would also like to ask you whether you have any knowledge of the

 6    fact that before the arrival of the Uzice Corps and before the incident at

 7    the dam, of any incidents when buses were passing through or a JNA convoy

 8    that was passing through and that on some occasions the police station was

 9    under siege and it was besieged by some persons, among whom was Murat

10    Sabanovic and his brother.

11       A.   I heard about such events that you mentioned as to an army convoy

12    that was blocked.  I don't recall this.  It might have happened.  It might

13    not have happened.  I don't know.

14       Q.   Do you remember an incident when a bust of the Nobel Prize-winning

15    writer Ivo Andric was pulled down?  Who did that?

16       A.   I also heard about this incident.  I did not see any of it

17    personally.  I was not there.  But I heard that -- at least that was the

18    tale that was going around, that Murat Sabanovic knocked down the bust of

19    Ivo Andric and threw it into the river.  This was the rumour, that

20    something like this happened.

21       Q.   That this incident and the other incidents that you also heard

22    about, as far as you remember, did those incidents cause any disruptions

23    in the relations, interpersonal relations in the town of Visegrad?

24       A.   Yes, they did have a negative impact on the interpersonal

25    relations or, rather, inter-ethnic relations.


Page 195

 1       Q.   You spoke about the person who helped you leave Visegrad, Stanko

 2    Pecikoza; is that correct?

 3       A.   Yes.

 4       Q.   Is this the person that you refer to as the vice-president of the

 5    SDS in Visegrad?  Is this the same person?

 6       A.   Yes.

 7       Q.   You said today that he was killed by the SDS members, the members

 8    of the same party of which he was the vice-president.  Can you tell us

 9    something more about that?  Who were you referring to?  Do you know who

10    killed him and why SDS?

11       A.   At the time when Stanko was killed, I was not in Visegrad.  I

12    heard that he was killed on the border between Serbia and Bosnia, in that

13    area.  The rumour had it that he was killed because he disagreed with the

14    SDS policy and that this was done by them or by persons acting on their

15    orders.

16       Q.   At that time, you were far away from Visegrad, if I understood

17    correctly, at least in Macedonia if not even further away.  So I don't

18    know.  On what do you base your knowledge or where did you hear that

19    Pecikoza was killed in this way?

20            JUDGE HUNT:  Mr. Domazet, you asked him the question.  He made it

21    very clear that he had no personal knowledge.  He said it was rumour.

22    Now, why don't we get on with something that is relevant in this case?

23            MR. DOMAZET: [Interpretation]

24       Q.   Just one more thing regarding the speech delivered by Jovanovic.

25    At least that was the name you gave him.  You said that he had said, among


Page 196

 1    other things, that the so-called White Eagles were also under his

 2    command.

 3       A.   Yes.

 4       Q.   My question is:  At that time, were there such formations in

 5    Visegrad, and who represented those formations in Visegrad if there were

 6    any?

 7       A.   As far as I know, at that time there were no such formations in

 8    Visegrad, but everybody heard that such formations existed.  And they were

 9    the holy terror.  The Muslims were very much afraid of them, the Muslims

10    in Visegrad.

11       Q.   So at the time when he spoke about it, there were no such

12    formations in Visegrad?

13       A.   Not in Visegrad but in the village of Dobrun, which is 10 or

14    perhaps 12 kilometres from Visegrad in the direction of Serbia.  They were

15    there.  People would find their insignia.  So they were there, but not in

16    the town itself.

17       Q.   Do you have any information whether these were people who came

18    from Serbia or somewhere else or whether these were local Serbs?

19       A.   It is hard to say this specifically, whether these were the people

20    from Serbia or local Serbs.  My personal opinion is that it was a mixture

21    of both, both people from the outside and the locals.

22       Q.   In view of your answer, I assume that you do not know the names of

23    the -- even of the locals?

24       A.   No, I don't.

25            MR. DOMAZET:  I have no further questions, Your Honour.


Page 197

 1            JUDGE HUNT:  Any re-examination?

 2            MR. GROOME:  I have no redirect, Your Honour.

 3            JUDGE HUNT:  Thank you, sir, for coming to give evidence before

 4    the Tribunal.  You are now free to leave.

 5            Who is your next witness, Mr. Groome?

 6            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I have an application when the witness

 7    leaves.

 8            THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] I wish to thank Your Honours.

 9            JUDGE HUNT:  Thank you, sir.

10                          [The witness withdrew]

11            JUDGE HUNT:  Yes, Mr. Groome.

12            MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, the pace of the proceedings has gone a

13    little bit quicker than I had anticipated.

14            JUDGE HUNT:  Now, look, Mr. Groome, if there is one thing that you

15    were fairly warned about, it was that we did not accept your estimate, so

16    you must have these witnesses waiting.

17            MR. GROOME:  We are doing our best, Your Honour, but you realise

18    the Court has changed the trial schedule now two times in the last two

19    weeks.  We are doing our best.  I tried to contact this witness.  This

20    next witness, I will be making an oral application for protective

21    measures.  Could I ask that we go into closed session, deal with that

22    matter now, and he will be here first thing in the morning?  And I will do

23    my best to back up witnesses now so that there is no more down time.  And

24    I apologise to the Court for this inconvenience at this time.

25            JUDGE HUNT:  I don't know quite what you mean when you say the


Page 198

 1    Court has changed the schedule twice in the last two weeks.  I know of

 2    only one.  At one stage, we were going to be sharing courtrooms with other

 3    trials.

 4            MR. GROOME:  For example, Your Honour, this morning I was just

 5    informed that next week we will be working full days instead of half

 6    days.  That is the change in the schedule.  That we are working hard to

 7    get these witnesses from this different country over here -- last Monday I

 8    was before -- during August I was under the impression that we would be

 9    working primarily half days, five days a week.  When I returned last

10    Monday, I was informed that we would be working full days this week.  We

11    have been doing our best to accommodate the changes in this schedule.  I

12    assure the Court that we have no intention of wasting any of the Court's

13    time, but it is difficult when these people do live in different countries

14    to make everything happen on such short notice.

15            JUDGE HUNT:  I assume that you thought that this witness would

16    last the whole week, then.  You must have other witnesses here.

17            MR. GROOME:  I thought that he would last the entire day, Your

18    Honour.

19            JUDGE HUNT:  Well, then you better make sure next time you don't.

20    When you talk about half days, there was never any suggestion of half

21    days.  The schedule, as I understood it, that was being proposed by the

22    Registry, was four hours a day each, and those who were unlucky enough to

23    be in the afternoon shift would finish at 7.00 at night.  There is no half

24    days.  There were certainly shorter days.

25            MR. GROOME:  Yes, shorter days.


Page 199

 1            JUDGE HUNT:  We are sitting four and a half days a week, and you

 2    should proceed that that will be so hopefully for the rest of the trial.

 3    We will be sitting four to four and a half days a week, depending on the

 4    speed with which you go through your witnesses.  But we really must have

 5    witnesses sitting around waiting.  They are required to be here.  The next

 6    witness must be here in case something dramatic happens and any witness

 7    finishes.  Now, so you haven't got the witness VG14, who was due to be

 8    your first witness, either.

 9            MR. GROOME:  No, Your Honour.

10            JUDGE HUNT:  Very well.  Then we will go into private session.

11    Just one moment while that's being organised.

12                          [Private session]

13   (redacted)

14   (redacted)

15   (redacted)

16   (redacted)

17   (redacted)

18   (redacted)

19   (redacted)

20   (redacted)

21   (redacted)

22   (redacted)

23   (redacted)

24   (redacted)

25   (redacted)


Page 200

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11  Pages 200-205 redacted.  Private session.

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25


Page 206

 1   (redacted)

 2   (redacted)

 3   (redacted)

 4   (redacted)

 5   (redacted)

 6   (redacted)

 7                          --- Whereupon the hearing adjourned at 3.55 p.m.,

 8                          to be reconvened on Tuesday, the 11th day

 9                          of September, 2001, at 9.30 a.m.

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25