| Press Release | CHAMBERS |
(Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document)
CS/1513e
Tribunal dismisses Karadžić motion for acquittal on 10 of 11 counts of the indictment
|
|
| Radovan Karadžić |
Trial Chamber III of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia today dismissed Radovan Karadžić’s oral motion for a judgement of acquittal on ten counts of the indictment but granted his motion in relation to count one of the indictment in which he was charged with genocide for the crimes committed between March and December 1992 in several municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The Chamber’s oral ruling was delivered pursuant to Rule 98 bis of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure and Evidence which provides that at the close of the Prosecutor's case, the Trial Chamber shall, by oral decision, and after hearing the oral submissions of the parties, enter a judgement of acquittal on any count if there is no evidence capable of supporting a conviction.
The Prosecution charges Karadžić, former President of Republika Srpska, head of the Serb Democratic Party and Supreme Commander of the Bosnian Serb Army, with 11 counts of genocide, crimes against humanity and violations of the laws or customs of war committed in Bosnia and Herzegovina between 1992 and 1995.
Count 1 of the Indictment charges genocide in relation to the crimes alleged to have been committed between 31 March and 31 December 1992 against the Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats in some municipalities in BiH. Having reviewed the totality of the evidence with respect to the killing of, serious bodily or mental harm to, the forcible displacement of, and conditions of life inflicted on Bosnian Muslims and/or Bosnian Croats in the Municipalities, the Chamber found that the evidence even if taken at its highest, does not reach the level from which a reasonable trier of fact could infer that genocide occurred in the Municipalities.
The Chamber noted that genocidal intent can be inferred from a number of factors and circumstances, including the general context of the case, the means available to the perpetrator, the surrounding circumstances, the perpetration of other culpable acts systematically directed against the same group, the numerical scale of atrocities committed, the repetition of destructive and discriminatory acts, the derogatory language targeting the protected group, or the existence of a plan or policy to commit the underlying offence. The Chamber noted that although it has heard evidence of culpable acts systematically directed against Bosnian Muslims and/or Bosnian Croats in the Municipalities, and of the repetition of discriminatory acts and derogatory language, the nature, scale, and context of these culpable acts do not reach the level from which a reasonable trier of fact could infer that they were committed with genocidal intent.
The Chamber found that whilst the evidence it had heard indicates that the circumstances in which the Bosnian Muslims and/or Bosnian Croats in the Municipalities were forcibly transferred or displaced from their homes were attended by conditions of great hardship and suffering, and that some of those displaced may have suffered serious bodily or mental harm during this process, this evidence does not rise to the level which could sustain a conclusion that the serious bodily or mental harm suffered by those forcibly transferred in the Municipalities was attended by such circumstances as to lead to the death of the whole or part of the displaced population for the purposes of the actus reus for genocide.
The Chamber dismissed the Accused’s request for a judgement of acquittal on the remaining ten Counts in the Indictment.
In relation to Counts other than Count I of the Indictment related to the Municipalities, the Chamber found that evidence was presented with regards to Karadzic’s voluntary participation in a joint criminal enterprise (JCE) composed of members of the Bosnian Serb leadership, the purpose of which was to permanently remove the Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats from Bosnian-Serb claimed territory in BiH, that he shared the intent of the other members of this JCE to carry out its objective through the commission of the crimes of persecutions, extermination, murder, deportation and inhumane acts (forcible transfer), and that he contributed to it through his acts and omissions.
In relation to the Hostages component of the case, which covers the alleged detention of over 200 UN peacekeepers and military observers, the Chamber found that there is evidence on which, if accepted, a reasonable trier of fact could be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that: - the crime of taking hostages as a violation of the laws or customs of war was carried out by Bosnian Serb forces between May and June 1995; that there existed a JCE, the common purpose of which was to take UN personnel hostage in order to compel NATO to abstain from conducting further air strikes against Bosnian Serb military targets; and that that Karadzic voluntarily participated in this JCE and shared the intent of the other members of this JCE to carry out its objective.
In relation to the Sarajevo component of the indictment, the Chamber found that there is evidence on which, if accepted, a reasonable trier of fact could be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that: - murder charged as a crime against humanity and as a violation of the laws or customs of war was carried out by Bosnian Serb forces in Sarajevo; that the crimes of terror and unlawful attacks were carried out by Bosnian Serb Forces in Sarajevo; between April 1992 and November 1995, that there was a joint criminal enterprise to establish and carry out a campaign of sniping and shelling against the civilian population of Sarajevo; and that the objective of this JCE involved the commission of the crimes of terror, unlawful attacks on civilians, and murder.
In relation to Karadzic’s contribution to the crimes committed during the siege of Sarajevo, the Chamber found that there is evidence upon which, if accepted, a reasonable trier of fact could be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the Accused voluntarily participated in the joint criminal enterprise relating to Sarajevo through both his acts and omissions and that he shared the intent of the other members of this JCE to carry out its objective, namely to establish and carry out a campaign of sniping and shelling against the civilian population of Sarajevo with the intent of spreading terror. Further, the Chamber found that there is evidence to suggest that he shared the intent of the other members of the JCE to commit the crimes of murder, terror, and unlawful attacks on civilians.
In relation to the Srebrenica component of the case, the Chamber found that in relation to Counts 4, 5 and 6 of the Indictment, that there is evidence on which, if accepted, a reasonable trier of fact could be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that: - murder charged as a crime against humanity and as a violation of the laws or customs of war, and extermination charged as a crime against humanity were carried out by Bosnian Serb forces in Srebrenica in 1995.
In relation to Count 2 of the Indictment, genocide in Srebrenica, the Chamber found that there is evidence on which, if accepted, a reasonable trier of fact could be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that was carried out by Bosnian Serb Forces in Srebrenica.
In relation to Counts 3, 7 and 8 of the Indictment insofar as they relate to Srebrenica, the Chamber found that there is evidence on which, if accepted, a reasonable trier of fact could be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the crimes of deportation and forcible transfer, an inhumane act, as crimes against humanity were carried out by Bosnian Serb Forces in Srebrenica in July 1995 and that persecutions charged as a crime against humanity were committed in Srebrenica in July and August 1995 by Bosnian Serb Forces against Bosnian Muslims with the intent to discriminate against them specifically based on race, religion, or politics.
In relation to Karadzic’s responsibility for Counts 2 to 8 as set out above, in relation to Srebrenica, the Chamber was satisfied that there is evidence upon which, if accepted, a reasonable trier of fact could be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that: - there existed a joint criminal enterprise composed of members of the Bosnian Serb leadership, military, police and other officials including the Accused, the purpose of which was to eliminate the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica through the commission of the crimes as charged in paragraph 20 of the Indictment; and that the Accused voluntarily participated in this joint criminal enterprise. The Chamber also found that there is evidence to suggest that the Accused shared the intent of the other members of this joint criminal enterprise to carry out its objectives, including the specific intent to commit genocide and the specific intent to discriminate against the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica specifically based on race, religion, or politics.
Karadžić was indicted on 25 July 1995 and was transferred into the Tribunal’s custody on 30 July 2008 after more than 13 years spent evading arrest. The trial began on 26 October 2009. The Defence case is scheduled to open on 16 October 2012
Since its establishment, the Tribunal has indicted 161 persons for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed on the territory of the former Yugoslavia between 1991 and 2001. Proceedings against 126 have been concluded. Proceedings are currently ongoing for 35 Accused.
*****
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
For more information, please contact our Media Office in The Hague
Tel.: +31-70-512-8752; 512-5343; 512-5356 - Email: press [at] icty.org ()
Follow ICTY on Facebook, Twitter and Youtube